Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/7770
Title: Comparison of central corneal thickness, thinnest corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth, and simulated keratometry using Galilei, Pentacam, and Sirius devices
Authors: Anayol, M.A.
Güler, E.
Yagci, R.
Şekeroglu, M.A.
Yilmazoglu, M.
Tirhiş, H.
Kulak, A.E.
Keywords: anterior chamber depth
central corneal thickness
Galilei
Pentacam
simulated keratometry
Sirius
thinnest corneal thickness
adolescent
adult
analysis of variance
anterior eye chamber depth
article
clinical article
clinical evaluation
cornea thickness
cornea topographer
device comparison
eye structural assessment equipment
female
human
keratometry
male
normal human
ophthalmic camera
patient selection
priority journal
sirius
Adolescent
Adult
Anterior Chamber
Cornea
Corneal Pachymetry
Corneal Topography
Female
Healthy Volunteers
Humans
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Reference Values
Reproducibility of Results
Young Adult
Publisher: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins
Abstract: Purpose: The aim was to evaluate the agreement in the central corneal thickness (CCT), thinnest corneal thickness (TCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and mean simulated keratometry (simK) measurements using Pentacam, Galilei, and Sirius Scheimpflug systems in normal eyes. Methods: Anterior segment measurements were performed with Pentacam, Galilei, and Sirius devices in 32 healthy subjects. The right eye of each participant was selected. Measurements obtained with the 3 systems were compared using repeated-measures analysis of variance and Bonferroni multiple comparisons test. Results: Analysis of variance determined a significant difference in the anterior segment measurements of CCT, TCT, ACD, and simK between the 3 devices (P < 0.001). Pairwise comparisons of CCT and TCT measurements were significantly different except for the comparison between Pentacam and Sirius. All pairwise comparisons for ACD were statistically significant. The pairwise comparison results for simK values showed that the Galilei and Sirius systems demonstrated better agreement with each other than with Pentacam. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that the Pentacam, Galilei, and Sirius Scheimpflug systems should not be accepted as interchangeable for CCT, TCT, ACD, and simK in healthy subjects. Copyright © 2014 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/7770
https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000000119
ISSN: 0277-3740
Appears in Collections:PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection

Show full item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

41
checked on Sep 30, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

31
checked on Sep 24, 2024

Page view(s)

54
checked on Aug 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.