Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11499/7770
Title: | Comparison of central corneal thickness, thinnest corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth, and simulated keratometry using Galilei, Pentacam, and Sirius devices | Authors: | Anayol, M.A. Güler, E. Yagci, R. Şekeroglu, M.A. Yilmazoglu, M. Tirhiş, H. Kulak, A.E. |
Keywords: | anterior chamber depth central corneal thickness Galilei Pentacam simulated keratometry Sirius thinnest corneal thickness adolescent adult analysis of variance anterior eye chamber depth article clinical article clinical evaluation cornea thickness cornea topographer device comparison eye structural assessment equipment female human keratometry male normal human ophthalmic camera patient selection priority journal sirius Adolescent Adult Anterior Chamber Cornea Corneal Pachymetry Corneal Topography Female Healthy Volunteers Humans Imaging, Three-Dimensional Male Middle Aged Prospective Studies Reference Values Reproducibility of Results Young Adult |
Publisher: | Lippincott Williams and Wilkins | Abstract: | Purpose: The aim was to evaluate the agreement in the central corneal thickness (CCT), thinnest corneal thickness (TCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and mean simulated keratometry (simK) measurements using Pentacam, Galilei, and Sirius Scheimpflug systems in normal eyes. Methods: Anterior segment measurements were performed with Pentacam, Galilei, and Sirius devices in 32 healthy subjects. The right eye of each participant was selected. Measurements obtained with the 3 systems were compared using repeated-measures analysis of variance and Bonferroni multiple comparisons test. Results: Analysis of variance determined a significant difference in the anterior segment measurements of CCT, TCT, ACD, and simK between the 3 devices (P < 0.001). Pairwise comparisons of CCT and TCT measurements were significantly different except for the comparison between Pentacam and Sirius. All pairwise comparisons for ACD were statistically significant. The pairwise comparison results for simK values showed that the Galilei and Sirius systems demonstrated better agreement with each other than with Pentacam. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that the Pentacam, Galilei, and Sirius Scheimpflug systems should not be accepted as interchangeable for CCT, TCT, ACD, and simK in healthy subjects. Copyright © 2014 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/11499/7770 https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000000119 |
ISSN: | 0277-3740 |
Appears in Collections: | PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
Show full item record
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
41
checked on Nov 16, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
31
checked on Nov 22, 2024
Page view(s)
54
checked on Aug 24, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.