Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/7838
Title: Intermittent catheterization in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury: Obstacles, worries, level of satisfaction
Authors: Yilmaz, B.
Akkoç, Y.
Alaca, R.
Erhan, B.
Gündüz, B.
Yıldız, Necmettin
Gök, H.
Keywords: adult
American Spinal Injury Association impairment scale
Article
automutilation
catheter infection
fear
female
hand function
human
intermittent catheterization
major clinical study
male
motor performance
paraplegia
patient satisfaction
patient worry
personal hygiene
priority journal
quadriplegia
spasticity
spinal cord injury
urine incontinence
visual analog scale
adverse effects
bladder catheterization
catheterization
complication
follow up
middle aged
outcome assessment
posttraumatic stress disorder
psychology
quality of life
questionnaire
satisfaction
sex difference
Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic
Adult
Catheterization
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Personal Satisfaction
Quality of Life
Questionnaires
Sex Factors
Stress Disorders, Traumatic
Urinary Catheterization
Visual Analog Scale
Publisher: Nature Publishing Group
Abstract: Objectives: The aim of this study is to examine the obstacles in people with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) face performing intermittent catheterization (IC), also their worries and level of satisfaction. Methods: Two hundred sixty-nine patients performing IC for at least 3 months were asked to fill-out a questionnaire about their opinions on IC. Results: In total, 69.5% of patients performed IC themselves, 10.4% had performed by their mothers, 7.8% by another caregiver and 7.4% by their spouse. For the 72 (26%) patients unable to apply IC, reasons were insufficient hand function (56.1%), being unable to sit appropriately (35.4%) and spasticity (8.5%). In all, 70% of male patients had insufficient hand function, 20% could not sit and 10% had spasticity while 56.3% of female patients could not sit, 37.5% had insufficient hand function and 63% had spasticity. Difference between sexes was found to be statistically significant (P<0.05). Worries patients had when starting IC were fear of being dependent on IC (50.2%), accidentally injuring self (43.8%), embarrassment (43.2%), causing an infection (40.2%), bleeding (32.7%), fear of feeling pain (30.2%) and hygiene (24.7%). More women felt embarrassment; other items were similar in both sexes. In all, 46.9% of patients had urinary incontinence in intervals. Conclusion: In total, 69.5% of patients performed IC themselves. Men's most common obstacle was insufficient hand function while women's was being unable to sit appropriately. Patients' most common worries were being dependent on IC for life. In all, 46.9% had incontinence in intervals; 47.9% said IC improved their life quality; and 97.4% preferred IC over continuous catheterization. © 2014 International Spinal Cord Society All rights reserved.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/7838
https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2014.134
ISSN: 1362-4393
Appears in Collections:PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
sc2014134.pdf275.88 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

21
checked on Dec 21, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

19
checked on Dec 18, 2024

Page view(s)

52
checked on Aug 24, 2024

Download(s)

22
checked on Aug 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.