Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11499/7838
Title: | Intermittent catheterization in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury: Obstacles, worries, level of satisfaction | Authors: | Yilmaz, B. Akkoç, Y. Alaca, R. Erhan, B. Gündüz, B. Yıldız, Necmettin Gök, H. |
Keywords: | adult American Spinal Injury Association impairment scale Article automutilation catheter infection fear female hand function human intermittent catheterization major clinical study male motor performance paraplegia patient satisfaction patient worry personal hygiene priority journal quadriplegia spasticity spinal cord injury urine incontinence visual analog scale adverse effects bladder catheterization catheterization complication follow up middle aged outcome assessment posttraumatic stress disorder psychology quality of life questionnaire satisfaction sex difference Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic Adult Catheterization Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Male Middle Aged Outcome Assessment (Health Care) Personal Satisfaction Quality of Life Questionnaires Sex Factors Stress Disorders, Traumatic Urinary Catheterization Visual Analog Scale |
Publisher: | Nature Publishing Group | Abstract: | Objectives: The aim of this study is to examine the obstacles in people with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) face performing intermittent catheterization (IC), also their worries and level of satisfaction. Methods: Two hundred sixty-nine patients performing IC for at least 3 months were asked to fill-out a questionnaire about their opinions on IC. Results: In total, 69.5% of patients performed IC themselves, 10.4% had performed by their mothers, 7.8% by another caregiver and 7.4% by their spouse. For the 72 (26%) patients unable to apply IC, reasons were insufficient hand function (56.1%), being unable to sit appropriately (35.4%) and spasticity (8.5%). In all, 70% of male patients had insufficient hand function, 20% could not sit and 10% had spasticity while 56.3% of female patients could not sit, 37.5% had insufficient hand function and 63% had spasticity. Difference between sexes was found to be statistically significant (P<0.05). Worries patients had when starting IC were fear of being dependent on IC (50.2%), accidentally injuring self (43.8%), embarrassment (43.2%), causing an infection (40.2%), bleeding (32.7%), fear of feeling pain (30.2%) and hygiene (24.7%). More women felt embarrassment; other items were similar in both sexes. In all, 46.9% of patients had urinary incontinence in intervals. Conclusion: In total, 69.5% of patients performed IC themselves. Men's most common obstacle was insufficient hand function while women's was being unable to sit appropriately. Patients' most common worries were being dependent on IC for life. In all, 46.9% had incontinence in intervals; 47.9% said IC improved their life quality; and 97.4% preferred IC over continuous catheterization. © 2014 International Spinal Cord Society All rights reserved. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/11499/7838 https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2014.134 |
ISSN: | 1362-4393 |
Appears in Collections: | PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
sc2014134.pdf | 275.88 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
21
checked on Nov 16, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
19
checked on Nov 21, 2024
Page view(s)
52
checked on Aug 24, 2024
Download(s)
22
checked on Aug 24, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.