Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/7858
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDireskeneli, H.-
dc.contributor.authorAkkoç, N.-
dc.contributor.authorBes, C.-
dc.contributor.authorÇakir, N.-
dc.contributor.authorÇefle, A.-
dc.contributor.authorÇobankara, Veli-
dc.contributor.authorDalkiliç, E.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-16T12:32:57Z
dc.date.available2019-08-16T12:32:57Z
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.issn0392-856X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11499/7858-
dc.description.abstractObjective: Unmet needs of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients regarding physician/patient communication, treatment preferences and quality of life issues were investigated in a Turkish survey study. Methods: The study was conducted with the contribution of 33 rheumatologists, and included 519 RA patients. The study population included patients who had been on biologic therapy for >6 months and were still receiving biologic therapy (BT group), and those who were biologic naive, but found eligible for biologic treatment (NBT group). Of the RA patients, 35.5% initially had a visit to an internal disease specialist, 25.5% to a physical therapy and rehabilitation specialist, and 12.2% to a rheumatology specialist for their RA complaints. The diagnosis of RA was made by a rheumatologist in 48.2% of patients. Results: The majority of RA patients (86.3%) visit their doctor within 15-week intervals. Most of the physician-patient communication focused on disease symptoms (99.0%) and impact of the disease on quality of life (61.8%). The proportion of RA patients who perceived their health status as good/very good/excellent was higher in the BT group than in the NBT group (74.3% vs. 51.5%, p<0.001). However, of those RA patients in the NBT group, only 24.8% have been recommended to start a biologic treatment by their doctors. With respect to dose frequency options, once-monthly injections were preferred (80%) to a bi-weekly injection schedule (8%). Conclusion: In conclusion, RA patients receiving biologic therapy reported higher rates of improved symptoms and better quality of life and seemed to be more satisfied with their treatment in our study. © Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology 2014.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherClinical and Experimental Rheumatology S.A.S.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofClinical and Experimental Rheumatologyen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectPatient surveyen_US
dc.subjectQuality of lifeen_US
dc.subjectRheumatoid arthritisen_US
dc.subjectadalimumaben_US
dc.subjectcorticosteroiden_US
dc.subjectetanercepten_US
dc.subjectinfliximaben_US
dc.subjectleflunomideen_US
dc.subjectmethotrexateen_US
dc.subjectnonsteroid antiinflammatory agenten_US
dc.subjectacupunctureen_US
dc.subjectadulten_US
dc.subjectalternative medicineen_US
dc.subjectarticleen_US
dc.subjectbiological therapyen_US
dc.subjectcommunication skillen_US
dc.subjectcontrolled studyen_US
dc.subjectDAS28en_US
dc.subjectdoctor patient relationen_US
dc.subjectfemaleen_US
dc.subjecthealth statusen_US
dc.subjecthealth surveyen_US
dc.subjecthumanen_US
dc.subjecthuman impact (environment)en_US
dc.subjectmajor clinical studyen_US
dc.subjectmaleen_US
dc.subjectmedical specialisten_US
dc.subjectpatient preferenceen_US
dc.subjectphysiotherapyen_US
dc.subjectpriority journalen_US
dc.subjectquality of lifeen_US
dc.subjectquestionnaireen_US
dc.subjectrehabilitationen_US
dc.subjectrheumatoid arthritisen_US
dc.subjectrheumatologyen_US
dc.subjectTurkey (republic)en_US
dc.subjectAdulten_US
dc.subjectAntirheumatic Agentsen_US
dc.subjectArthritis, Rheumatoiden_US
dc.subjectAttitude of Health Personnelen_US
dc.subjectBiological Productsen_US
dc.subjectCommunicationen_US
dc.subjectDrug Administration Scheduleen_US
dc.subjectFemaleen_US
dc.subjectHealth Care Surveysen_US
dc.subjectHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, Practiceen_US
dc.subjectHealth Services Needs and Demanden_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectMaleen_US
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden_US
dc.subjectNeeds Assessmenten_US
dc.subjectPatient Preferenceen_US
dc.subjectPatient Satisfactionen_US
dc.subjectPatientsen_US
dc.subjectPerceptionen_US
dc.subjectPhysician-Patient Relationsen_US
dc.subjectQuality of Lifeen_US
dc.subjectQuestionnairesen_US
dc.subjectSeverity of Illness Indexen_US
dc.subjectTime Factorsen_US
dc.subjectTreatment Outcomeen_US
dc.subjectTurkeyen_US
dc.titleImpact of rheumatoid arthritis in Turkey: A questionnaire studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.volume32en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage477
dc.identifier.startpage477en_US
dc.identifier.endpage483en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.pmid24960289en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84904903828en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000341171000006en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1-
dc.ownerPamukkale University-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.dept14.02. Internal Medicine-
Appears in Collections:PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
checked on Oct 13, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

2
checked on Nov 21, 2024

Page view(s)

54
checked on Aug 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check





Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.