Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11499/7904
Title: | Comparison of the effectiveness of active and passive neuromuscular electrical stimulation of hemiplegic upper extremities: A randomized, controlled trial | Authors: | Boyacı, Ahmet Topuz, Oya Alkan, Hakan Özgen, Merih Sarsan, Ayşe Yıldız, Necmettin Ardıç, Füsun |
Keywords: | Neuromuscular electrical stimulation Rehabilitation Stroke Upper extremity Functional independence measures Goniometric measurements Metacarpophalangeal joints Neuromuscular electrical stimulations (NMES) Statistically significant difference Human rehabilitation equipment Patient rehabilitation Physical therapy Electromyography arm article cerebrovascular accident comparative study controlled clinical trial controlled study electromyography electrostimulation therapy female hand strength hemiplegia human joint characteristics and functions male methodology middle aged nerve cell plasticity pathophysiology prospective study randomized controlled trial treatment outcome wrist Electric Stimulation Therapy Female Hand Strength Hemiplegia Humans Male Middle Aged Neuronal Plasticity Prospective Studies Range of Motion, Articular Treatment Outcome Upper Extremity Wrist Joint |
Abstract: | To compare the efficacy of electromyography (EMG)-triggered (active) neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) and passive NMES in enhancing the upper extremity (UE) motor and functional recovery of subacute and chronic stage stroke patients. Thirty-one hemiplegic patients were randomly assigned to active NMES (n=11), passive NMES (n=10), and control (sham stimulation) (n=10) groups. Each treatment regimen was applied five times per week for 45 min for 3 weeks. All of the patients performed the same neurophysiologic exercise program for 45 min five times per week for 3 weeks. Patients were assessed by the UE component of the Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment (UE-FMA), the self-care component of the Functional Independence Measure (self-care FIM), the Motor Activity Log (MAL), goniometric measurements of active wrist and metacarpophalangeal joint extension, surface EMG potentials, grip strength, and the modified Ashworth scale in a blinded manner. Data were obtained before and at the end of the treatment. Participants were similar in all clinical and demographic features (P>0.05). All groups were comparable with respect to UE-FMA, MAL, self-care FIM, wrist and finger flexor spasticity, active range of motion (ROM), grip strength, and surface EMG potentials before treatment (P>0.05). The active ROM, grip strength, FMA, FIM, surface EMG potentials, and MAL: amount of use were significantly improved in the EMG-triggered NMES group compared with the controls (P<0.05). The active wrist extension ROM and FMA scores were significantly improved in the passive NMES group compared with the controls (P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between active and passive NMES groups in any of the parameters evaluated at the end of the treatment (P>0.05). Both active and passive NMES as adjuvant therapy in the neurophysiologic exercise program effectively enhanced the UE motor and functional recovery of stroke survivors. © 2013 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/11499/7904 https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0b013e328360e541 |
ISSN: | 0342-5282 |
Appears in Collections: | PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
Show full item record
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
43
checked on Nov 16, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
34
checked on Nov 21, 2024
Page view(s)
60
checked on Aug 24, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.