Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11499/7909
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Bulus, H. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Basar, O. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tas, A. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yavuz, A. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Akkoca, M. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Coskun, A | - |
dc.contributor.author | Coban, S. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-08-16T12:33:23Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-08-16T12:33:23Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0026-4733 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11499/7909 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Aim. Laparoscopy is the gold standard procedure in the surgery of gall bladder. Harmonic scalpel and bipolar vessel sealer are the other instruments for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of the three instruments for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods. A total of 60 patients were included into the study. Patients were divided into three groups. In Group A, cystic duct and artery were sealed using laparoscopic clips and gall bladder was dissected from the hepatic bed using electrocautery. In Group B, cystic duct and artery were sealed using Harmonic scalpel and gall bladder was dissected from the hepatic bed using Harmonic scalpel. In Group C, cystic duct and artery were sealed using Bipolar vessel sealer and gall bladder was dissected from the hepatic bed using Bipolar vessel sealer. Groups were compared for the following parameters: duration of surgery, amount of drainage, cystic duct opening pressure and cost. Results. The duration of surgery was 31.5±11.1 minutes in Group B, 33.1±10 minutes in Group A, and 36.5±9.9 in Group C; and the difference between Group B and Group C was statistically significant (P<0.04). Cystic duct opening pressure was highest in Group A which was 324.0±23.4 mmHg. For all of these 3 groups total cost was found to be 900$, 2900$, 1800$ for groups A, B, and C; respectively. Conclusion. In laparoscopic cholecystectomy different energy source instruments may be safe to use with a cautious dissection and sealinn of the cystic duct. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Minerva Chirurgica | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Cholecystectomy, laparoscopic | en_US |
dc.subject | Surgical instruments | en_US |
dc.subject | Surgical procedures, minimally invasive | en_US |
dc.subject | article | en_US |
dc.subject | cholecystectomy | en_US |
dc.subject | comparative study | en_US |
dc.subject | equipment | en_US |
dc.subject | equipment design | en_US |
dc.subject | female | en_US |
dc.subject | human | en_US |
dc.subject | male | en_US |
dc.subject | middle aged | en_US |
dc.subject | Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic | en_US |
dc.subject | Equipment Design | en_US |
dc.subject | Female | en_US |
dc.subject | Humans | en_US |
dc.subject | Male | en_US |
dc.subject | Middle Aged | en_US |
dc.title | Evaluation of three instruments for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Harmonic scalpel, bipolar vessel sealer, and conventional technique | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 68 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 6 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 537 | - |
dc.identifier.startpage | 537 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 542 | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 24193285 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-84891587736 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000329272300002 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q3 | - |
dc.owner | Pamukkale University | - |
item.openairetype | Article | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
item.fulltext | No Fulltext | - |
item.grantfulltext | none | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
Appears in Collections: | PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
11
checked on Nov 23, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
11
checked on Nov 22, 2024
Page view(s)
54
checked on Aug 24, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.