Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11499/8741
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Akalin, S. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kutlu, Selda Sayın | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cirak, B. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Eskiçorapcı, S.Y. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bagdatli, D. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Akkaya, S. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-08-16T12:46:13Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-08-16T12:46:13Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2210-7703 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11499/8741 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-011-9601-3 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objective To evaluate quality of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) and to calculate the cost per procedure in a Turkish university hospital. Setting A 352-bed teaching hospital in Denizli, Turkey. Method An prospective audit was performed between July and October 2010. All clean, clean-contaminated and contaminated elective surgical procedures in ten surgical wards were recorded. Antimicrobial use was calculated per procedure using the ATC-DDD system. The appropriateness of antibiotic use for each procedure was evaluated according to international guidelines on PAP. In addition, the cost per procedure was calculated. Results Overall, in 577 of the 625 (92.3%) of the studied procedures, PAP was used. PAP was indicated in 12.5% of the group where it was not used, and not indicated in 7.1% of the group where it was used. Unnecessarily prolonged antimicrobial prophylaxis was observed in 56.9% of the procedures, mean duration was 2.6 ± 2.7 days. The most frequently used antimicrobials were cefazolin (117.9 DDD/100-operation) and sulbactam/ ampicillin (102.2 DDD/100-operation). The timing of the starting dose was appropriate in 545 procedures (94.5%). In the group that received PAP, only 80 (13.7%) of the procedures were found to be fully appropriate and correct. The density of antimicrobial use per operation was 2.8 DDD. The mean cost of the use of prophylactic antimicrobials €18.6 per procedure. Conclusion The density of antimicrobial use in PAP was found to be very high in our hospital. Antibiotic overuse extended into the postoperative period. © 2011 CARS. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Kluwer Academic Publishers | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Appropriateness | en_US |
dc.subject | ATC-DDD index | en_US |
dc.subject | Audit | en_US |
dc.subject | Cost | en_US |
dc.subject | Perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis | en_US |
dc.subject | Turkey | en_US |
dc.subject | amikacin | en_US |
dc.subject | cefazolin | en_US |
dc.subject | ceftriaxone | en_US |
dc.subject | cefuroxime | en_US |
dc.subject | ciprofloxacin | en_US |
dc.subject | clindamycin | en_US |
dc.subject | gentamicin | en_US |
dc.subject | ornidazole | en_US |
dc.subject | sultamicillin | en_US |
dc.subject | vancomycin | en_US |
dc.subject | antiinfective agent | en_US |
dc.subject | adult | en_US |
dc.subject | Anatomic Therapeutic Chemical Defined Daily Doses system | en_US |
dc.subject | antibiotic prophylaxis | en_US |
dc.subject | article | en_US |
dc.subject | calculation | en_US |
dc.subject | drug choice | en_US |
dc.subject | drug cost | en_US |
dc.subject | drug use | en_US |
dc.subject | female | en_US |
dc.subject | general surgery | en_US |
dc.subject | human | en_US |
dc.subject | major clinical study | en_US |
dc.subject | male | en_US |
dc.subject | medical audit | en_US |
dc.subject | named inventories, questionnaires and rating scales | en_US |
dc.subject | perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis | en_US |
dc.subject | practice guideline | en_US |
dc.subject | prescription | en_US |
dc.subject | priority journal | en_US |
dc.subject | surgical infection | en_US |
dc.subject | surgical technique | en_US |
dc.subject | surgical ward | en_US |
dc.subject | Turkey (republic) | en_US |
dc.subject | university hospital | en_US |
dc.subject | aged | en_US |
dc.subject | clinical practice | en_US |
dc.subject | drug administration | en_US |
dc.subject | economics | en_US |
dc.subject | methodology | en_US |
dc.subject | middle aged | en_US |
dc.subject | prospective study | en_US |
dc.subject | standard | en_US |
dc.subject | statistics | en_US |
dc.subject | time | en_US |
dc.subject | Adult | en_US |
dc.subject | Aged | en_US |
dc.subject | Anti-Bacterial Agents | en_US |
dc.subject | Antibiotic Prophylaxis | en_US |
dc.subject | Drug Administration Schedule | en_US |
dc.subject | Drug Costs | en_US |
dc.subject | Female | en_US |
dc.subject | Hospitals, University | en_US |
dc.subject | Humans | en_US |
dc.subject | Male | en_US |
dc.subject | Middle Aged | en_US |
dc.subject | Physician's Practice Patterns | en_US |
dc.subject | Practice Guidelines as Topic | en_US |
dc.subject | Prospective Studies | en_US |
dc.subject | Time Factors | en_US |
dc.subject | Young Adult | en_US |
dc.title | Application of ATC/DDD methodology to evaluate perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 34 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 120 | - |
dc.identifier.startpage | 120 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 126 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s11096-011-9601-3 | - |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 22207273 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-84860812449 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000299329300018 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q1 | - |
dc.owner | Pamukkale University | - |
item.openairetype | Article | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
item.fulltext | No Fulltext | - |
item.grantfulltext | none | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
crisitem.author.dept | 14.02. Internal Medicine | - |
Appears in Collections: | PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
18
checked on Nov 23, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
15
checked on Nov 21, 2024
Page view(s)
28
checked on Aug 24, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.