Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/8741
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAkalin, S.-
dc.contributor.authorKutlu, Selda Sayın-
dc.contributor.authorCirak, B.-
dc.contributor.authorEskiçorapcı, S.Y.-
dc.contributor.authorBagdatli, D.-
dc.contributor.authorAkkaya, S.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-16T12:46:13Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-16T12:46:13Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.issn2210-7703-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11499/8741-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-011-9601-3-
dc.description.abstractObjective To evaluate quality of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) and to calculate the cost per procedure in a Turkish university hospital. Setting A 352-bed teaching hospital in Denizli, Turkey. Method An prospective audit was performed between July and October 2010. All clean, clean-contaminated and contaminated elective surgical procedures in ten surgical wards were recorded. Antimicrobial use was calculated per procedure using the ATC-DDD system. The appropriateness of antibiotic use for each procedure was evaluated according to international guidelines on PAP. In addition, the cost per procedure was calculated. Results Overall, in 577 of the 625 (92.3%) of the studied procedures, PAP was used. PAP was indicated in 12.5% of the group where it was not used, and not indicated in 7.1% of the group where it was used. Unnecessarily prolonged antimicrobial prophylaxis was observed in 56.9% of the procedures, mean duration was 2.6 ± 2.7 days. The most frequently used antimicrobials were cefazolin (117.9 DDD/100-operation) and sulbactam/ ampicillin (102.2 DDD/100-operation). The timing of the starting dose was appropriate in 545 procedures (94.5%). In the group that received PAP, only 80 (13.7%) of the procedures were found to be fully appropriate and correct. The density of antimicrobial use per operation was 2.8 DDD. The mean cost of the use of prophylactic antimicrobials €18.6 per procedure. Conclusion The density of antimicrobial use in PAP was found to be very high in our hospital. Antibiotic overuse extended into the postoperative period. © 2011 CARS.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishersen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Clinical Pharmacyen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAppropriatenessen_US
dc.subjectATC-DDD indexen_US
dc.subjectAuditen_US
dc.subjectCosten_US
dc.subjectPerioperative antimicrobial prophylaxisen_US
dc.subjectTurkeyen_US
dc.subjectamikacinen_US
dc.subjectcefazolinen_US
dc.subjectceftriaxoneen_US
dc.subjectcefuroximeen_US
dc.subjectciprofloxacinen_US
dc.subjectclindamycinen_US
dc.subjectgentamicinen_US
dc.subjectornidazoleen_US
dc.subjectsultamicillinen_US
dc.subjectvancomycinen_US
dc.subjectantiinfective agenten_US
dc.subjectadulten_US
dc.subjectAnatomic Therapeutic Chemical Defined Daily Doses systemen_US
dc.subjectantibiotic prophylaxisen_US
dc.subjectarticleen_US
dc.subjectcalculationen_US
dc.subjectdrug choiceen_US
dc.subjectdrug costen_US
dc.subjectdrug useen_US
dc.subjectfemaleen_US
dc.subjectgeneral surgeryen_US
dc.subjecthumanen_US
dc.subjectmajor clinical studyen_US
dc.subjectmaleen_US
dc.subjectmedical auditen_US
dc.subjectnamed inventories, questionnaires and rating scalesen_US
dc.subjectperioperative antibiotic prophylaxisen_US
dc.subjectpractice guidelineen_US
dc.subjectprescriptionen_US
dc.subjectpriority journalen_US
dc.subjectsurgical infectionen_US
dc.subjectsurgical techniqueen_US
dc.subjectsurgical warden_US
dc.subjectTurkey (republic)en_US
dc.subjectuniversity hospitalen_US
dc.subjectageden_US
dc.subjectclinical practiceen_US
dc.subjectdrug administrationen_US
dc.subjecteconomicsen_US
dc.subjectmethodologyen_US
dc.subjectmiddle ageden_US
dc.subjectprospective studyen_US
dc.subjectstandarden_US
dc.subjectstatisticsen_US
dc.subjecttimeen_US
dc.subjectAdulten_US
dc.subjectAgeden_US
dc.subjectAnti-Bacterial Agentsen_US
dc.subjectAntibiotic Prophylaxisen_US
dc.subjectDrug Administration Scheduleen_US
dc.subjectDrug Costsen_US
dc.subjectFemaleen_US
dc.subjectHospitals, Universityen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectMaleen_US
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden_US
dc.subjectPhysician's Practice Patternsen_US
dc.subjectPractice Guidelines as Topicen_US
dc.subjectProspective Studiesen_US
dc.subjectTime Factorsen_US
dc.subjectYoung Adulten_US
dc.titleApplication of ATC/DDD methodology to evaluate perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.volume34en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage120-
dc.identifier.startpage120en_US
dc.identifier.endpage126en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11096-011-9601-3-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.pmid22207273en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84860812449en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000299329300018en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1-
dc.ownerPamukkale University-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.dept14.02. Internal Medicine-
Appears in Collections:PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

18
checked on Nov 23, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

15
checked on Nov 21, 2024

Page view(s)

28
checked on Aug 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.