Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/8807
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorÖzdemir, Mevci-
dc.contributor.authorAttar, A.-
dc.contributor.authorKuzu, I.-
dc.contributor.authorAyten, M.-
dc.contributor.authorOzgencil, E.-
dc.contributor.authorBozkurt, M.-
dc.contributor.authorDalva, K.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-16T12:47:34Z
dc.date.available2019-08-16T12:47:34Z
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.issn1550-8943-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11499/8807-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12015-012-9376-5-
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study was to address the question of whether bone marrow-originated mononuclear cells (MNC) or mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) induce neural regeneration when implanted intraspinally. Materials and Methods: The study design included 4 groups of mice: Group 1, non-traumatized control group; Groups 2, 3 and 4 spinal cord traumatized mice with 1 g force Tator clips, which received intralesionally either no cellular implants (Group 2), luciferase (Luc) (+) MNC (Group 3) or MSC (Group 4) obtained from CMV-Luc or beta-actin Luc donor transgenic mice. Following the surgery until decapitation, periodical radioluminescence imaging (RLI) and Basso Mouse Scale (BMS) evaluations was performed to monitor neural activity. Postmortem immunohistochemical techniques were used to analyze the fate of donor type implanted cells. Results: All mice of Groups 3 and 4 showed various degrees of improvement in the BMS scores, whereas there was no change in Groups 1 and 2. The functional improvement was significantly better in Group 4 compared to Group 3 (18 vs 8, p = 0. 002). The immunohistochemical staining demonstrated GFP + Luc + neuronal/glial cells that were also positive with one or more of these markers: nestin, myelin associated glycoprotein, microtubule associated protein or myelin oligodendrocyte specific protein, which is considered as indicator of donor type neuronal regeneration. Frequency of donor type neuronal cells; Luc + signals and median BMS scores were observed 48-64 % and 68-72 %; 44-80 %; 8 and 18 within Groups III and IV respectively. Discussion: MSCs were more effective than MNC in obtaining neuronal recovery. Substantial but incomplete functional improvement was associated with donor type in vivo imaging signals more frequently than the number of neuronal cells expressing donor markers in spinal cord sections in vitro. Our results are in favor of functional recovery arising from both donor MSC and MNCs, contributing to direct neuronal regeneration and additional indirect mechanisms. © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherHumana Press Inc.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofStem Cell Reviews and Reportsen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectMesenchymal stem cellen_US
dc.subjectRegenerationen_US
dc.subjectSpinal corden_US
dc.subjectStem cellen_US
dc.subjectTraumaen_US
dc.subjectMusen_US
dc.subjectMus musculusen_US
dc.titleStem Cell Therapy in Spinal Cord Injury: In Vivo and Postmortem Tracking of Bone Marrow Mononuclear or Mesenchymal Stem Cellsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.volume8en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage953
dc.identifier.startpage953en_US
dc.identifier.endpage962en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-9432-5521-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12015-012-9376-5-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.pmid22552878en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84865574006en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000307333100029en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2-
dc.ownerPamukkale University-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeArticle-
crisitem.author.dept14.01. Surgical Medicine-
Appears in Collections:PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

29
checked on Nov 16, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

25
checked on Nov 21, 2024

Page view(s)

48
checked on Aug 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.