Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11499/8885
Title: | Comment on “First records of syn-diagenetic non-tectonic folding in Quaternary thermogene travertines caused by hydrothermal incremental veining” by Billi et al. Tectonophysics 700–701 (2017) 60–79 | Authors: | Alçiçek, Mehmet Cihat Alçiçek, Hülya Altunel, E. Arenas, C. Bons, P. Brogi, A. Capezzuoli, E. |
Keywords: | Age rejuvenation Calcite veins Deformational processes Enterolithic structures Travertine depositional geometry Travertine facies Calcite Calcium carbonate Deposits Endocrinology Quarries Tectonics Depositional system Internal structure Secondary structures Three-dimensional settings Three-dimensional structure Limestone |
Publisher: | Elsevier B.V. | Abstract: | Billi et al. (2017) proposed a new interpretation for the origin and internal structure of thermogene travertine deposits. On the basis of evidence from two quarries located in southern Tuscany (Italy), they interpreted some travertine beds as calcite veins and argued that undulating travertine beds formed by syn-diagenetic (i.e. non-tectonic) folding that was caused by laterally-confined volume expansion caused by incremental veining. They assumed that such a process causes changes to the rock properties, including porosity reduction, rock strengthening, and age rejuvenation. The interpretations by Billi et al. (2017) challenge and question the current understanding and interpretation of thermogene travertine deposits. This understanding, based on numerous studies since the 1980s, is that these deposits form from thermal water flowing downslope, and precipitating calcium carbonate. Here, we explain how the comparison with active depositional systems is essential for the understanding the origin of structures in older, inactive travertine deposits, such as those studied by Billi et al. (2017). We further argue that the three-dimensional setting of travertine deposits should be taken into account in order to discuss the possible development of secondary structures. Indeed travertine deposition on slopes typically leads to the formation of terraced morphologies with pools bordered by rounded rims and separated from each other by steep walls. The resulting three-dimensional structures can be misinterpreted as asymmetric folds in two-dimensional views (i.e., in saw-cut walls of quarry). In this paper we debate the interpretations offered by Billi et al. (2017) and their criteria to recognise syn-diagenetic, non-tectonic folds in travertine deposits, and explain why many of their ideas are questionable. © 2017 Elsevier B.V. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/11499/8885 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2017.09.002 |
ISSN: | 0040-1951 |
Appears in Collections: | Mühendislik Fakültesi Koleksiyonu Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
texto_completo.pdf | 1.6 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
12
checked on Nov 23, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
12
checked on Nov 22, 2024
Page view(s)
38
checked on Aug 24, 2024
Download(s)
50
checked on Aug 24, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.