Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11499/9100
Title: | Unenhanced and contrast-enhanced MR angiography and perfusion imaging for suspected pulmonary thromboembolism | Authors: | Ohno, Y. Yoshikawa, T. Kishida, Y. Seki, S. Karabulut, Nevzat |
Keywords: | CT Deep venous thrombosis MR angiography MRI Pulmonary thromboembolism gadolinium pentetate contrast medium arterial spin labeling computed tomographic angiography contrast enhancement deep vein thrombosis diagnostic accuracy diagnostic value digital subtraction angiography dynamic first pass contrast enhanced perfusion magnetic resonance imaging echography human intermethod comparison lung embolism magnetic resonance angiography magnetic resonance venography multidetector computed tomography nuclear magnetic resonance scanner perfusion weighted imaging phlebography predictive value reliability Review sensitivity and specificity single photon emission computed tomography three dimensional imaging time resolved contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography diagnostic imaging differential diagnosis image enhancement procedures reproducibility vein thrombosis Contrast Media Diagnosis, Differential Humans Image Enhancement Magnetic Resonance Angiography Phlebography Pulmonary Embolism Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity Venous Thrombosis |
Publisher: | American Roentgen Ray Society | Abstract: | OBJECTIVE. This article discusses the basics of unenhanced MR angiography (MRA) and MR venography (MRV), time-resolved contrast-enhanced (CE) MRA and dynamic firstpass CE perfusion MRI, and unenhanced and CE MRV, in addition to assessing the clinical relevance of these techniques for evaluating patients with suspected pulmonary thromboembolism and deep venous thrombosis. CONCLUSION. Since the 1990s, the efficacy of MRA or MRV and dynamic perfusion MRI for patients with suspected pulmonary thromboembolism and deep venous thrombosis has been evaluated. On the basis of the results of single-center trials, comprehensive MRI protocols, including pulmonary unenhanced and CE MRA, perfusion MRI, and MRV, promise to be safe and time effective for assessing patients with suspected pulmonary thromboembolism, although future multicenter trials are required to assess the real clinical value of MRI. © 2017 American Roentgen Ray Society. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/11499/9100 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.16.17415 |
ISSN: | 0361-803X |
Appears in Collections: | PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
Show full item record
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
18
checked on Nov 23, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
19
checked on Nov 22, 2024
Page view(s)
32
checked on Aug 24, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.