Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11499/9112
Title: | The use of biomarkers in the diagnosis and treatment of overactive bladder: Can we predict the patients who will be resistant to treatment? | Authors: | Alkis, O. Zümrütbaş, Ali Ersin Toktas, C. Aybek, Hülya Aybek, Zafer |
Keywords: | biomarkers brain derived neurotrophic factor glycosaminoglycans monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 nerve growth factor overactive bladder cre recombinase Gag protein monocyte chemotactic protein 1 solifenacin biological marker CCL2 protein, human urinary tract agent adult Article clinical article controlled study disease marker disease severity female human male outcome assessment postmenopause prediction premenopause questionnaire symptom treatment duration treatment response urine sampling validation study aged middle aged treatment failure treatment outcome urine Adult Aged Biomarkers Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Chemokine CCL2 Female Humans Male Middle Aged Nerve Growth Factor Solifenacin Succinate Treatment Failure Treatment Outcome Urinary Bladder, Overactive Urological Agents |
Publisher: | John Wiley and Sons Inc. | Abstract: | Aims: The main objective of this study was to define urinary biomarkers that can predict the severity of overactive bladder and detect patients who would benefit most from treatment. Methods: Patients with an OAB diagnosis and healthy controls were included in the study. A bladder diary and a validated OAB questionnaire were given to all patients. In the OAB group, solifenacin 5 mg daily was given for 1 month. Urine samples were taken before the treatment and after the first month of the treatment in both groups and urinary BDNF, NGF, GAG, and MCP-1 levels were measured. Results: A total of 45 OAB patients and 45 healthy age-matched controls were included. BDNF/Cre, NGF/Cre, MCP-1/Cre, and GAG/Cre levels were significantly higher in the OAB group. The levels of these biomarkers significantly decreased after 1 month of solifenacin treatment. After treatment, 66.7% of patients OAB symptoms were relieved and 33.3% did not respond to the treatment. Although basal biomarker levels did not differ between responder and non-responder groups, the ratio of decrease in biomarker levels was significantly higher in treatment-sensitive patients. Postmenopausal women were more resistant to treatment when compared with the premenopausal group. Conclusions: Urinary biomarkers have a role in the pathophysiology of OAB however they did not predict the patients who would benefit from the treatment and in whom antimuscarinics would be useless. Future studies with higher numbers of patients and different OAB subgroups are needed to investigate the exact role of these (and other) biomarkers. Neurourol. Urodynam. 36:390–393, 2017. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/11499/9112 https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22939 |
ISSN: | 0733-2467 |
Appears in Collections: | PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
Show full item record
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
28
checked on Nov 23, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
28
checked on Nov 24, 2024
Page view(s)
44
checked on Aug 24, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.