Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/9313
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFan, K.C.-
dc.contributor.authorTsikata, E.-
dc.contributor.authorKhoueir, Z.-
dc.contributor.authorSimavlı, Hüseyin-
dc.contributor.authorGuo, R.-
dc.contributor.authorDe, R.A.L.-
dc.contributor.authorPandit, S.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-16T12:59:44Z
dc.date.available2019-08-16T12:59:44Z
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.issn1057-0829-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11499/9313-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000000647-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To compare the diagnostic capability of 3-dimensional (3D) neuroretinal rim parameters with existing 2-dimensional (2D) neuroretinal and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness rim parameters using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) volume scans. Materials and Methods: Design: Institutional prospective pilot study. Study population: 65 subjects (35 open-angle glaucoma patients, 30 normal patients). Observation procedures: One eye of each subject was included. SD-OCT was used to obtain 2D RNFL thickness values and 5 neuroretinal rim parameters [ie, 3D minimum distance band (MDB) thickness, 3D Bruch's membrane opening-minimum rim width (BMO-MRW), 3D rim volume, 2D rim area, and 2D rim thickness]. Main outcome measures: Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values, sensitivity, and specificity. Results: Comparing all 3D with all 2D parameters, 3D rim parameters (MDB, BMO-MRW, rim volume) generally had higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values (range, 0.770 to 0.946) compared with 2D parameters (RNFL thickness, rim area, rim thickness; range, 0.678 to 0.911). For global region analyses, all 3D rim parameters (BMO-MRW, rim volume, MDB) were equal to or better than 2D parameters (RNFL thickness, rim area, rim thickness; P-values from 0.023 to 1.0). Among the three 3D rim parameters (MDB, BMO-MRW, and rim volume), there were no significant differences in diagnostic capability (false discovery rate >0.05 at 95% specificity). Conclusions: 3D neuroretinal rim parameters (MDB, BMO-MRW, and rim volume) demonstrated better diagnostic capability for primary and secondary open-angle glaucomas compared with 2D neuroretinal parameters (rim area, rim thickness). Compared with 2D RNFL thickness, 3D neuroretinal rim parameters have the same or better diagnostic capability. © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherLippincott Williams and Wilkinsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Glaucomaen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subject3-dimensional volume scanen_US
dc.subjectBruch's membrane opening-minimum rim widthen_US
dc.subjectminimum distance banden_US
dc.subjectprimary open-angle glaucomaen_US
dc.subjectspectral domain optical coherence tomographyen_US
dc.subjectadulten_US
dc.subjectageden_US
dc.subjectalgorithmen_US
dc.subjectArticleen_US
dc.subjectbest corrected visual acuityen_US
dc.subjectBruch membraneen_US
dc.subjectcomparative studyen_US
dc.subjectcontrolled studyen_US
dc.subjectdemographyen_US
dc.subjectdiagnostic procedureen_US
dc.subjecteye trackingen_US
dc.subjectfemaleen_US
dc.subjectgonioscopyen_US
dc.subjecthumanen_US
dc.subjectimage analysisen_US
dc.subjectmajor clinical studyen_US
dc.subjectmaleen_US
dc.subjectmiddle ageden_US
dc.subjectoculoplethysmographyen_US
dc.subjectopen angle glaucomaen_US
dc.subjectophthalmoscopyen_US
dc.subjectoutcome assessmenten_US
dc.subjectpilot studyen_US
dc.subjectpriority journalen_US
dc.subjectproliferative diabetic retinopathyen_US
dc.subjectprospective studyen_US
dc.subjectpseudoexfoliationen_US
dc.subjectpublicationen_US
dc.subjectreceiver operating characteristicen_US
dc.subjectretina degenerationen_US
dc.subjectretinal nerve fiber layer thicknessen_US
dc.subjectsensitivity and specificityen_US
dc.subjectthree dimensional imagingen_US
dc.subjectdiagnostic imagingen_US
dc.subjectintraocular pressureen_US
dc.subjectnerve fiberen_US
dc.subjectoptic disken_US
dc.subjectoptical coherence tomographyen_US
dc.subjectpathologyen_US
dc.subjectphysiologyen_US
dc.subjectproceduresen_US
dc.subjectretina ganglion cellen_US
dc.subjectAgeden_US
dc.subjectFemaleen_US
dc.subjectGlaucoma, Open-Angleen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectImaging, Three-Dimensionalen_US
dc.subjectIntraocular Pressureen_US
dc.subjectMaleen_US
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden_US
dc.subjectNerve Fibersen_US
dc.subjectOptic Disken_US
dc.subjectPilot Projectsen_US
dc.subjectProspective Studiesen_US
dc.subjectRetinal Ganglion Cellsen_US
dc.subjectROC Curveen_US
dc.subjectSensitivity and Specificityen_US
dc.subjectTomography, Optical Coherenceen_US
dc.titleEnhanced diagnostic capability for glaucoma of 3-dimensional versus 2-dimensional neuroretinal rim parameters using spectral domain optical coherence tomographyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Glaucomaen_US
dc.identifier.volume26en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.startpage450en_US
dc.identifier.endpage458en_US
dc.authorid0000-0003-1657-9099-
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/IJG.0000000000000647-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.pmid28234677en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85013755681en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000400473300009en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1-
dc.ownerPamukkale University-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
10.1097 IJG.0000000000000647.pdf379.45 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

26
checked on Jun 29, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

24
checked on Jul 2, 2024

Page view(s)

22
checked on May 27, 2024

Download(s)

14
checked on May 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.