Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/9376
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTopkara, Adem-
dc.contributor.authorÖzkan, Adem-
dc.contributor.authorÖzcan, Ramazan Hakan-
dc.contributor.authorÖksüz, M.-
dc.contributor.authorAkbulut, M.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-16T13:00:22Z
dc.date.available2019-08-16T13:00:22Z
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.issn1090-820X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11499/9376-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjw137-
dc.description.abstractBackground Diced cartilage grafts are important in rhinoplasty for raising the dorsum and eliminating dorsal irregularities. The most common problems with the use of diced cartilage are wrapping and cartilage resorption. Objectives To histopathologically investigate and compare the viability of diced cartilage grafts wrapped with concentrated growth factor, fascia and fenestrated fascia, or blood glue. Methods Cartilage grafts were harvested from the ears of 10 New Zealand White rabbits and diced into 0.5 to 1 mm3 pieces. The grafts were divided into five groups for comparison: (1) bare diced cartilage; (2) diced cartilage wrapped with fascia; (3) diced cartilage wrapped with fenestrated fascia; (4) diced cartilage wrapped with concentrated growth factor (CGF); and (5) diced cartilage wrapped with blood glue. Each of the five grafts was autologously implanted into a subcutaneous pocket in the back of each rabbit. Three months later, the rabbits were sacrificed and the implants were harvested and examined histopathologically. Results Nucleus loss, calcification, inflammation, and giant cell formation differed significantly between the CGF group and both fascia groups. Chondrocyte proliferation was the highest in the CGF group. Nucleus loss rates were similar between the fascia and fenestrated fascia groups. Conclusions Our findings suggest that CGF improves the viability of diced cartilage grafts, while fascia hampers it. Punching holes in the fascia does not improve diced cartilage graft viability and neither does blood glue wrapping. © copyright Crown 2016.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAesthetic Surgery Journalen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectbiomaterialen_US
dc.subjectblood glueen_US
dc.subjectconcentrated growth factoren_US
dc.subjectglueen_US
dc.subjectgrowth factoren_US
dc.subjectunclassified drugen_US
dc.subjectfibrin glueen_US
dc.subjectsignal peptideen_US
dc.subjectanimal experimenten_US
dc.subjectanimal tissueen_US
dc.subjectArticleen_US
dc.subjectbone regenerationen_US
dc.subjectcalcificationen_US
dc.subjectcartilage cellen_US
dc.subjectcartilage graften_US
dc.subjectcell lossen_US
dc.subjectcell nucleusen_US
dc.subjectcell proliferationen_US
dc.subjectcell viabilityen_US
dc.subjectchondrogenesisen_US
dc.subjectchondrolysisen_US
dc.subjectcontrolled studyen_US
dc.subjectdiced cartilage graften_US
dc.subjectfasciaen_US
dc.subjectfenestrated fasciaen_US
dc.subjectgiant cellen_US
dc.subjectgraft survivalen_US
dc.subjecthistopathologyen_US
dc.subjectinflammationen_US
dc.subjectmaleen_US
dc.subjectNew Zealand White (rabbit)en_US
dc.subjectnonhumanen_US
dc.subjectpriority journalen_US
dc.subjecttissue differentiationen_US
dc.subjecttissue engineeringen_US
dc.subjectanimalen_US
dc.subjectautotransplantationen_US
dc.subjectback muscleen_US
dc.subjectblooden_US
dc.subjectcartilageen_US
dc.subjectcomparative studyen_US
dc.subjectdrug effectsen_US
dc.subjectpathologyen_US
dc.subjectproceduresen_US
dc.subjectrabbiten_US
dc.subjecttime factoren_US
dc.subjecttissue survivalen_US
dc.subjecttransplantationen_US
dc.subjectAnimalsen_US
dc.subjectBack Musclesen_US
dc.subjectCartilageen_US
dc.subjectFibrin Tissue Adhesiveen_US
dc.subjectGraft Survivalen_US
dc.subjectIntercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteinsen_US
dc.subjectMaleen_US
dc.subjectRabbitsen_US
dc.subjectTime Factorsen_US
dc.subjectTissue and Organ Harvestingen_US
dc.subjectTissue Survivalen_US
dc.subjectTransplantation, Autologousen_US
dc.titleEffect of concentrated growth factor on survival of diced cartilage graften_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.volume36en_US
dc.identifier.issue10en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1176
dc.identifier.startpage1176en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1187en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/asj/sjw137-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.pmid27590866en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84994519217en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000387982600021en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1-
dc.ownerPamukkale University-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.dept14.01. Surgical Medicine-
Appears in Collections:PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
10.1093 asj sjw137.pdf1.94 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

28
checked on Dec 14, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

26
checked on Dec 20, 2024

Page view(s)

62
checked on Aug 24, 2024

Download(s)

18
checked on Aug 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.