Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11499/9376
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Topkara, Adem | - |
dc.contributor.author | Özkan, Adem | - |
dc.contributor.author | Özcan, Ramazan Hakan | - |
dc.contributor.author | Öksüz, M. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Akbulut, M. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-08-16T13:00:22Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-08-16T13:00:22Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1090-820X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11499/9376 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjw137 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background Diced cartilage grafts are important in rhinoplasty for raising the dorsum and eliminating dorsal irregularities. The most common problems with the use of diced cartilage are wrapping and cartilage resorption. Objectives To histopathologically investigate and compare the viability of diced cartilage grafts wrapped with concentrated growth factor, fascia and fenestrated fascia, or blood glue. Methods Cartilage grafts were harvested from the ears of 10 New Zealand White rabbits and diced into 0.5 to 1 mm3 pieces. The grafts were divided into five groups for comparison: (1) bare diced cartilage; (2) diced cartilage wrapped with fascia; (3) diced cartilage wrapped with fenestrated fascia; (4) diced cartilage wrapped with concentrated growth factor (CGF); and (5) diced cartilage wrapped with blood glue. Each of the five grafts was autologously implanted into a subcutaneous pocket in the back of each rabbit. Three months later, the rabbits were sacrificed and the implants were harvested and examined histopathologically. Results Nucleus loss, calcification, inflammation, and giant cell formation differed significantly between the CGF group and both fascia groups. Chondrocyte proliferation was the highest in the CGF group. Nucleus loss rates were similar between the fascia and fenestrated fascia groups. Conclusions Our findings suggest that CGF improves the viability of diced cartilage grafts, while fascia hampers it. Punching holes in the fascia does not improve diced cartilage graft viability and neither does blood glue wrapping. © copyright Crown 2016. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Oxford University Press | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Aesthetic Surgery Journal | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | biomaterial | en_US |
dc.subject | blood glue | en_US |
dc.subject | concentrated growth factor | en_US |
dc.subject | glue | en_US |
dc.subject | growth factor | en_US |
dc.subject | unclassified drug | en_US |
dc.subject | fibrin glue | en_US |
dc.subject | signal peptide | en_US |
dc.subject | animal experiment | en_US |
dc.subject | animal tissue | en_US |
dc.subject | Article | en_US |
dc.subject | bone regeneration | en_US |
dc.subject | calcification | en_US |
dc.subject | cartilage cell | en_US |
dc.subject | cartilage graft | en_US |
dc.subject | cell loss | en_US |
dc.subject | cell nucleus | en_US |
dc.subject | cell proliferation | en_US |
dc.subject | cell viability | en_US |
dc.subject | chondrogenesis | en_US |
dc.subject | chondrolysis | en_US |
dc.subject | controlled study | en_US |
dc.subject | diced cartilage graft | en_US |
dc.subject | fascia | en_US |
dc.subject | fenestrated fascia | en_US |
dc.subject | giant cell | en_US |
dc.subject | graft survival | en_US |
dc.subject | histopathology | en_US |
dc.subject | inflammation | en_US |
dc.subject | male | en_US |
dc.subject | New Zealand White (rabbit) | en_US |
dc.subject | nonhuman | en_US |
dc.subject | priority journal | en_US |
dc.subject | tissue differentiation | en_US |
dc.subject | tissue engineering | en_US |
dc.subject | animal | en_US |
dc.subject | autotransplantation | en_US |
dc.subject | back muscle | en_US |
dc.subject | blood | en_US |
dc.subject | cartilage | en_US |
dc.subject | comparative study | en_US |
dc.subject | drug effects | en_US |
dc.subject | pathology | en_US |
dc.subject | procedures | en_US |
dc.subject | rabbit | en_US |
dc.subject | time factor | en_US |
dc.subject | tissue survival | en_US |
dc.subject | transplantation | en_US |
dc.subject | Animals | en_US |
dc.subject | Back Muscles | en_US |
dc.subject | Cartilage | en_US |
dc.subject | Fibrin Tissue Adhesive | en_US |
dc.subject | Graft Survival | en_US |
dc.subject | Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins | en_US |
dc.subject | Male | en_US |
dc.subject | Rabbits | en_US |
dc.subject | Time Factors | en_US |
dc.subject | Tissue and Organ Harvesting | en_US |
dc.subject | Tissue Survival | en_US |
dc.subject | Transplantation, Autologous | en_US |
dc.title | Effect of concentrated growth factor on survival of diced cartilage graft | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 36 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 10 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 1176 | |
dc.identifier.startpage | 1176 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 1187 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1093/asj/sjw137 | - |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 27590866 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-84994519217 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000387982600021 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q1 | - |
dc.owner | Pamukkale University | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
item.grantfulltext | open | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en | - |
item.openairetype | Article | - |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
crisitem.author.dept | 14.01. Surgical Medicine | - |
Appears in Collections: | PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
10.1093 asj sjw137.pdf | 1.94 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
28
checked on Dec 14, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
26
checked on Dec 20, 2024
Page view(s)
62
checked on Aug 24, 2024
Download(s)
18
checked on Aug 24, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.