Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/9403
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCaiazzo, G.-
dc.contributor.authorLongo, G.-
dc.contributor.authorGiavarini, A.-
dc.contributor.authorKılıç, İsmail Doğu-
dc.contributor.authorFabris, E.-
dc.contributor.authorSerdoz, R.-
dc.contributor.authorMattesini, A.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-16T13:01:00Z
dc.date.available2019-08-16T13:01:00Z
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.issn0167-5273-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11499/9403-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.07.033-
dc.description.abstractBackground The effect of optical coherence tomography (OCT) guidance on the implantation strategy during all phases of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVSs) in a real-world scenario has been poorly investigated. Methods Consecutive patients undergoing BVS implantation at our institution were included in this registry. Frequency-domain OCT pullbacks were performed at the operator's discretion during all phases of BVS implantation procedures to optimize preparation of lesions, confirm BVS size, and optimize expansion and apposition of scaffolds. Results Between September 2012 and July 2015, 203 BVSs were implanted in 101 consecutive patients at our institution (2.01 BVSs/patient). In 66 patients, the procedure was performed under OCT guidance. In the OCT subgroup, 66 (77.6%) of the 85 treated lesions were complex (B2/C AHA/ACC type). Overall, 147 OCT pullbacks were performed and 72/147 (49.0%) pullbacks indicated the need for changing strategy. After angiography-only-guided optimisation of BVS in 27 (31.8%) lesions, an OCT examination prompted performance of a second post-expansion. This resulted in an increase in the minimal scaffold area (5.5 to 6.3 mm2, p = 0.004) and a decrease in the incomplete scaffold apposition area (1.1 to 0.6 mm2, p = 0.082), with no new stent fractures. When the population was divided according to the time of BVS implantation, an initial learning adaptation became evident, with the number of OCT-guided changes in strategy significantly decreasing between the initial and final time periods (p = 0.017). Conclusions OCT guidance for BVS implantation significantly affects the procedural strategy, with favourable effects on acute results and the learning curve. © 2016en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ireland Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Cardiologyen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBioresorbable vascular scaffolden_US
dc.subjectOptical coherence tomographyen_US
dc.subjectPercutaneous coronary interventionen_US
dc.subjectadulten_US
dc.subjectArticleen_US
dc.subjectballoonen_US
dc.subjectballoon dilatationen_US
dc.subjectbioresorbable scaffolden_US
dc.subjectcontrolled studyen_US
dc.subjectcoronary angiographyen_US
dc.subjectcoronary artery bypass graften_US
dc.subjectcoronary artery diseaseen_US
dc.subjectfemaleen_US
dc.subjectfrequency domain optical coherence tomographyen_US
dc.subjecthumanen_US
dc.subjectimplantationen_US
dc.subjectmajor clinical studyen_US
dc.subjectmaleen_US
dc.subjectmiddle ageden_US
dc.subjectoptical coherence tomographyen_US
dc.subjectpercutaneous coronary interventionen_US
dc.subjectpriority journalen_US
dc.subjectretrospective studyen_US
dc.subjectstent fractureen_US
dc.subjectageden_US
dc.subjectbiodegradable implanten_US
dc.subjectblood vessel prosthesisen_US
dc.subjectblood vessel transplantationen_US
dc.subjectcomputer assisted surgeryen_US
dc.subjectcoronary blood vesselen_US
dc.subjectdevicesen_US
dc.subjectdiagnostic imagingen_US
dc.subjectproceduresen_US
dc.subjecttissue scaffolden_US
dc.subjecttreatment outcomeen_US
dc.subjectAbsorbable Implantsen_US
dc.subjectAgeden_US
dc.subjectBlood Vessel Prosthesisen_US
dc.subjectBlood Vessel Prosthesis Implantationen_US
dc.subjectCoronary Artery Diseaseen_US
dc.subjectCoronary Vesselsen_US
dc.subjectFemaleen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectMaleen_US
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden_US
dc.subjectPercutaneous Coronary Interventionen_US
dc.subjectSurgery, Computer-Assisteden_US
dc.subjectTissue Scaffoldsen_US
dc.subjectTomography, Optical Coherenceen_US
dc.subjectTreatment Outcomeen_US
dc.titleOptical coherence tomography guidance for percutaneous coronary intervention with bioresorbable scaffoldsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.volume221en_US
dc.identifier.startpage352
dc.identifier.startpage352en_US
dc.identifier.endpage358en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.07.033-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.pmid27404705en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84977616032en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000384692600067en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1-
dc.ownerPamukkale University-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.dept14.02. Internal Medicine-
Appears in Collections:PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

23
checked on Jun 29, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

23
checked on Jul 17, 2024

Page view(s)

22
checked on May 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.