Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11499/9558
Title: | Geotechnical land suitability assessment using spatial multi-criteria decision analysis | Authors: | Akyol, Erdal Kaya, Ali Alkan, M. |
Keywords: | Active tectonics Geotechnics GIS Microzoning Multi-criteria decision analysis Spatial analysis bearing capacity data set decision analysis flooding geotechnical survey infrastructural development interpolation kriging multicriteria analysis penetration test rupture S-wave soil classification spatial analysis uncertainty analysis wave velocity Turkey |
Publisher: | Springer Verlag | Abstract: | Decision making is a thought-provoking issue in complex engineering problems, and it contains many parameters and alternatives inherently. Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) is a common method to solve the problems involving many uncertainties, and it is employed here for answering some geotechnical issues. Soil type, underground water table (UWT), standard penetration test (SPT) (N) blow numbers, and shear wave velocity (Vs) have been used to sort out the settlement suitability of the municipal area by means of MCDA and geographic information systems (GISs). Each data set was classified into 10 groups and graded based on it. A soil classification map was constructed using Voronoi cells. The Kriging interpolation method was employed to draw the other maps. The study area was allocated into five zones ranging from very favorable to very unfavorable. The very favorable and favorable zones are southern, southwestern, and northern parts of the study area. Firm units with high bearing capacity are outcropped on these areas. Moreover, the UWT is deep enough to interact with structures. On the contrary, the very unfavorable and unfavorable zones are located around the central part of the study area where the altitude is very low. Therefore, the soils have higher fine contents which commonly have low bearing capacity and exhibit high ground amplification when they are encountered with UWT. The faults and creeks, crossed the study area, were enclosed and marked as very unfavorable. It is because of the Turkish infrastructure regulations against flooding and ground rupture risks. The moderate zones fall within the best and the worst zones. The results prove that the spatial multi-criteria decision analysis (SMCDA) descriptions match the perception of the geotechnical assessments. The study has verified that the method can be employed successfully in the geotechnical microzoning studies. © 2016, Saudi Society for Geosciences. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/11499/9558 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-016-2523-6 |
ISSN: | 1866-7511 |
Appears in Collections: | Mühendislik Fakültesi Koleksiyonu Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
Show full item record
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
8
checked on Dec 14, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
8
checked on Dec 20, 2024
Page view(s)
52
checked on Aug 24, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.