Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11499/9906Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Handzic, M. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Özlen, Muhammed Kürşad. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Durmic, N. | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-08-16T13:07:30Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2019-08-16T13:07:30Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1548-0666 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11499/9906 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.4018/IJKM.2016010103 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | A contingency perspective of knowledge management recognises the need for a fit between knowledge management solutions (KMS) and decision making contexts which they support. In order to determine the best fit, a field survey was carried out to investigate the impact of two different types of KMS (technical and social) on decision makers' behaviour and performance in different decision contexts (simple and complex). The results provide partial support for the contingency view. As expected, the study identified social KMS as the best fit for complex contexts, based on subjects' superior performance from comparable adoption of both KMS. In contrast, the study identified that both KMS were an equally good fit for simple contexts, based on similar levels of subjects' performance, but social KMS was preferred in terms of adoption. These findings contribute to much needed empirical evidence for research and provide useful guidance for practice. However, their limitations warrant further study. © 2016, IGI Global. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | IGI Global | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartof | International Journal of Knowledge Management | en_US |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
| dc.subject | Contingency perspective | en_US |
| dc.subject | Decision context | en_US |
| dc.subject | Decision performance | en_US |
| dc.subject | Knowledge management solution (KMS) | en_US |
| dc.subject | Knowledge processes | en_US |
| dc.subject | Knowledge management | en_US |
| dc.subject | Best fit | en_US |
| dc.subject | Contingency approaches | en_US |
| dc.subject | Decision makers | en_US |
| dc.subject | Field surveys | en_US |
| dc.subject | Knowledge process | en_US |
| dc.subject | Decision making | en_US |
| dc.title | A contingency approach to knowledge management: Finding the best fit | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.volume | 12 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 31 | |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 31 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 44 | en_US |
| dc.authorid | 0000-0002-9620-7334 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.4018/IJKM.2016010103 | - |
| dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-84980018885 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000413394200003 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q3 | - |
| dc.owner | Pamukkale University | - |
| item.fulltext | No Fulltext | - |
| item.languageiso639-1 | en | - |
| item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
| item.openairetype | Article | - |
| item.grantfulltext | none | - |
| item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
| Appears in Collections: | Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection Yabancı Diller Yüksekokulu Koleksiyonu | |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
8
checked on Sep 13, 2025
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
4
checked on Sep 15, 2025
Page view(s)
102
checked on Sep 8, 2025
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.