Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/9906
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHandzic, M.-
dc.contributor.authorÖzlen, Muhammed Kürşad.-
dc.contributor.authorDurmic, N.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-16T13:07:30Z
dc.date.available2019-08-16T13:07:30Z
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.issn1548-0666-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11499/9906-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4018/IJKM.2016010103-
dc.description.abstractA contingency perspective of knowledge management recognises the need for a fit between knowledge management solutions (KMS) and decision making contexts which they support. In order to determine the best fit, a field survey was carried out to investigate the impact of two different types of KMS (technical and social) on decision makers' behaviour and performance in different decision contexts (simple and complex). The results provide partial support for the contingency view. As expected, the study identified social KMS as the best fit for complex contexts, based on subjects' superior performance from comparable adoption of both KMS. In contrast, the study identified that both KMS were an equally good fit for simple contexts, based on similar levels of subjects' performance, but social KMS was preferred in terms of adoption. These findings contribute to much needed empirical evidence for research and provide useful guidance for practice. However, their limitations warrant further study. © 2016, IGI Global.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIGI Globalen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Knowledge Managementen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectContingency perspectiveen_US
dc.subjectDecision contexten_US
dc.subjectDecision performanceen_US
dc.subjectKnowledge management solution (KMS)en_US
dc.subjectKnowledge processesen_US
dc.subjectKnowledge managementen_US
dc.subjectBest fiten_US
dc.subjectContingency approachesen_US
dc.subjectDecision makersen_US
dc.subjectField surveysen_US
dc.subjectKnowledge processen_US
dc.subjectDecision makingen_US
dc.titleA contingency approach to knowledge management: Finding the best fiten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.volume12en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage31
dc.identifier.startpage31en_US
dc.identifier.endpage44en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-9620-7334-
dc.identifier.doi10.4018/IJKM.2016010103-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84980018885en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000413394200003en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3-
dc.ownerPamukkale University-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Appears in Collections:Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Yabancı Diller Yüksekokulu Koleksiyonu
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

7
checked on Jun 29, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

4
checked on Jul 10, 2024

Page view(s)

20
checked on May 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.