Bilgilendirme: Sürüm Güncellemesi ve versiyon yükseltmesi nedeniyle, geçici süreyle zaman zaman kesintiler yaşanabilir ve veri içeriğinde değişkenlikler gözlemlenebilir. Göstereceğiniz anlayış için teşekkür ederiz.
 

Application of several non-linear prediction tools for estimating uniaxial compressive strength of granitic rocks and comparison of their performances

Loading...
Publication Logo

Date

2016

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Springer-Verlag London Ltd

Open Access Color

Green Open Access

Yes

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Top 10%
Influence
Top 10%
Popularity
Top 1%

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

Uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) of rock is crucial for any type of projects constructed in/on rock mass. The test that is conducted to measure the UCS of rock is expensive, time consuming and having sample restriction. For this reason, the UCS of rock may be estimated using simple rock tests such as point load index (Is(50)), Schmidt hammer (Rn) and p-wave velocity (Vp) tests. To estimate the UCS of granitic rock as a function of relevant rock properties like Rn, p-wave and Is(50), the rock cores were collected from the face of the Pahang–Selangor fresh water tunnel in Malaysia. Afterwards, 124 samples are prepared and tested in accordance with relevant standards and the dataset is obtained. Further an established dataset is used for estimating the UCS of rock via three-nonlinear prediction tools, namely non-linear multiple regression (NLMR), artificial neural network (ANN) and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS). After conducting the mentioned models, considering several performance indices including coefficient of determination (R2), variance account for and root mean squared error and also using simple ranking procedure, the models were examined and the best prediction model was selected. It is concluded that the R2 equal to 0.951 for testing dataset suggests the superiority of the ANFIS model, while these values are 0.651 and 0.886 for NLMR and ANN techniques, respectively. The results pointed out that the ANFIS model can be used for predicting UCS of rocks with higher capacity in comparison with others. However, the developed model may be useful at a preliminary stage of design; it should be used with caution and only for the specified rock types. © 2015, Springer-Verlag London.

Description

Keywords

Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system, Artificial neural network, Granite, Non-linear multiple regression, Uniaxial compressive strength, Compressive strength, Forecasting, Fuzzy inference, Fuzzy systems, Mean square error, Neural networks, Seismic waves, Statistical tests, Tracking (position), Wave propagation, Coefficient of determination, Non linear, Non-linear predictions, Performance indices, Ranking procedures, Root mean squared errors, Rocks, Artificial neural network, Rocks, Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system, 330, Seismic waves, Granite, TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General), Compressive strength, 310, Statistical tests, Non linear, Root mean squared errors, Non-linear multiple regression, Wave propagation, Mean square error, Non-linear predictions, Fuzzy systems, Coefficient of determination, Fuzzy inference, Tracking (position), Ranking procedures, Performance indices, Uniaxial compressive strength, Neural networks, Forecasting

Fields of Science

0211 other engineering and technologies, 02 engineering and technology

Citation

WoS Q

Q1

Scopus Q

Q1
OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
120

Source

Engineering with Computers

Volume

32

Issue

2

Start Page

189

End Page

206
PlumX Metrics
Citations

CrossRef : 34

Scopus : 133

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 88

SCOPUS™ Citations

140

checked on Apr 12, 2026

Web of Science™ Citations

113

checked on Apr 12, 2026

Page Views

419

checked on Apr 12, 2026

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
11.65886914

Sustainable Development Goals