Application of several non-linear prediction tools for estimating uniaxial compressive strength of granitic rocks and comparison of their performances
Loading...

Date
2016
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Springer-Verlag London Ltd
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) of rock is crucial for any type of projects constructed in/on rock mass. The test that is conducted to measure the UCS of rock is expensive, time consuming and having sample restriction. For this reason, the UCS of rock may be estimated using simple rock tests such as point load index (Is(50)), Schmidt hammer (Rn) and p-wave velocity (Vp) tests. To estimate the UCS of granitic rock as a function of relevant rock properties like Rn, p-wave and Is(50), the rock cores were collected from the face of the Pahang–Selangor fresh water tunnel in Malaysia. Afterwards, 124 samples are prepared and tested in accordance with relevant standards and the dataset is obtained. Further an established dataset is used for estimating the UCS of rock via three-nonlinear prediction tools, namely non-linear multiple regression (NLMR), artificial neural network (ANN) and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS). After conducting the mentioned models, considering several performance indices including coefficient of determination (R2), variance account for and root mean squared error and also using simple ranking procedure, the models were examined and the best prediction model was selected. It is concluded that the R2 equal to 0.951 for testing dataset suggests the superiority of the ANFIS model, while these values are 0.651 and 0.886 for NLMR and ANN techniques, respectively. The results pointed out that the ANFIS model can be used for predicting UCS of rocks with higher capacity in comparison with others. However, the developed model may be useful at a preliminary stage of design; it should be used with caution and only for the specified rock types. © 2015, Springer-Verlag London.
Description
Keywords
Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system, Artificial neural network, Granite, Non-linear multiple regression, Uniaxial compressive strength, Compressive strength, Forecasting, Fuzzy inference, Fuzzy systems, Mean square error, Neural networks, Seismic waves, Statistical tests, Tracking (position), Wave propagation, Coefficient of determination, Non linear, Non-linear predictions, Performance indices, Ranking procedures, Root mean squared errors, Rocks, Artificial neural network, Rocks, Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system, 330, Seismic waves, Granite, TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General), Compressive strength, 310, Statistical tests, Non linear, Root mean squared errors, Non-linear multiple regression, Wave propagation, Mean square error, Non-linear predictions, Fuzzy systems, Coefficient of determination, Fuzzy inference, Tracking (position), Ranking procedures, Performance indices, Uniaxial compressive strength, Neural networks, Forecasting
Fields of Science
0211 other engineering and technologies, 02 engineering and technology
Citation
WoS Q
Q1
Scopus Q
Q1

OpenCitations Citation Count
120
Source
Engineering with Computers
Volume
32
Issue
2
Start Page
189
End Page
206
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 34
Scopus : 133
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 88
SCOPUS™ Citations
140
checked on Apr 12, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
113
checked on Apr 12, 2026
Page Views
419
checked on Apr 12, 2026
Google Scholar™


