Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/10192
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorÖzgüngör, Sevgi-
dc.contributor.authorDuru, E.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-16T13:13:18Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-16T13:13:18Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.issn1302-597X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11499/10192-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2015.61.7-
dc.description.abstractProblem Statement: One way to delineate the main characteristics of effective teaching within the higher education system is to gather college students’ opinions of an effective instructor. Research based on students’ perceptions of efficient teaching revealed a series of teaching behaviors setting the distinction between good and poor teaching. However, studies also indicate differences across culture, and in Turkey, there has been little research on the topic. Purpose of Study: The goal of this study was to determine instructor and course characteristics and teaching dimensions that discriminate between instructors who received the highest and the lowest student ratings within a Turkish college setting, by incorporating both quantitative and qualitative methods. Method: A total of 23,814 students across different departments in the university rated 630 instructors on a scale developed to assess students’ perceptions of instructors’ performance. In addition, students were asked to respond to an open-ended question to provide their own impressions of each instructor. Then, students’ ratings were analyzed by means of discriminative functional analysis, and written statements provided by students were analyzed via content-analysis techniques by using a combination of manual and computer-assisted methods (NVivo 9). Findings and Results: According to the quantitative analyses, although course and instructor characteristics were weak in discriminating the groups, all teaching dimensions (relationships with students, effective teaching, exams and evaluation, contribution to generic skills, class interaction, and organization and planning) were very useful in discriminating the instructors who received the best and the poorest ratings. Also, qualitative analysis revealed 4 themes consistently distinguishing the two groups: lecturing, relationship with the students, knowledge and expertise, and exams and evaluation. Conclusions and Recommendations: This study replicates the existing literature on student perceptions of effective teaching, with a culturally different, large sample. It also adds support to the notion that there are teaching behaviors, such as lecturing skills, fair evaluations, respect and interest toward students, and demonstrating expertise, that help draw the distinction between good and poor teaching in the eyes of students and that could therefore assist the improvements efforts of teacher education. © 2015, Ani Publishing. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAni Publishingen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEgitim Arastirmalari - Eurasian Journal of Educational Researchen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectCollege teachingen_US
dc.subjectInstructor effectivenessen_US
dc.subjectPoor teachingen_US
dc.subjectStudent evaluationsen_US
dc.titleCourse and instructor characteristics distinguishing highest and lowest student ratings of instructorsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.volume15en_US
dc.identifier.issue61en_US
dc.identifier.startpage118-
dc.identifier.startpage118en_US
dc.identifier.endpage136en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.14689/ejer.2015.61.7-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84957629705en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000422381700007en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3-
dc.ownerPamukkale University-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.dept09.05. Educational Sciences-
crisitem.author.dept09.05. Educational Sciences-
Appears in Collections:Eğitim Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
0857295001554724906.pdf12.82 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

5
checked on Aug 17, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

4
checked on Aug 9, 2024

Page view(s)

44
checked on Aug 17, 2024

Download(s)

374
checked on Aug 17, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.