Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11499/10356
Title: | An assessment of shear bond strength between ceramic repair systems and different ceramic infrastructures | Authors: | Kocaağaoğlu, Hasan Hüseyin Gürbulak, A. |
Keywords: | ceramic repair ceramics dentistry Alumina Bond strength (materials) Ceramic materials Dentistry Glass Glass ceramics Mechanical testing Precious metal alloys Precious metals Silicate minerals Strengthening (metal) Zirconia Ceramic restorations Ceramics Confidence interval Cylindrical specimens Infrastructure materials Kruskal-Wallis tests Non-precious metals Shear bond strengths Repair acrylic acid resin alloy aluminum oxide dental ceramics dental material galvano resin cement unclassified drug zirconium oxide adhesion Article confidence interval dental bonding evaluation study Kruskal Wallis test priority journal rank sum test scanning electron microscopy shear bond strength shear strength statistical analysis |
Publisher: | John Wiley and Sons Inc. | Abstract: | Summary The purpose of this study was to evaluate of shear bond strengths between two ceramic repair systems and different ceramic infrastructure materials. One hundred cylindrical specimens of ceramic infrastructure were fabricated with non precious metal alloy, zirconia, alumina, galvano, and glass ceramic: 20 non precious metal alloy (NP), 20 zirconia (Z), 20 alumina (A), 20 galvano (G), and 20 glass ceramic (GC). Specimens were divided into 2 subgroups. One half of the specimens were applied by Clearfil™ (CR) repair system and, another half of that were applied by Cimara&Cimara® Zircon (CZ) repair system. Bonded specimens were stored in 37°C distilled water for 24 h and were thermocycled at 5-55°C for 1,200 cycles with a 30-sec dwell time and 5-sec transfer time. Shear bond strengths were determined with a mechanical testing device. And mode of failure was recorded. Mann Whitney-U and Kruskal Wallis tests were applied to the data at 95% confidence interval level. Infrastructure groups displayed the following values in megapascals: NP = 10.70 ± 1.88; Z = 9.15 ± 0.80; A = 11.65 ± 0.70; GC = 10.95 ± 0.80; and G = 6.88 ± 0.88. The Mann Whitney-U test results showed no significant difference between the repair systems. The Kruskal Wallis test results demonstrated significant difference between the infrastructures. The lowest bond strength values were observed in G group. In conclusion, average bond strength values were in accordance with previously reported values, therefore it can be suggested that intraoral repair of ceramic restorations can be temporary, but a satisfying alternative for patients. SCANNING 37:300-305, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © Wiley Periodicals, Inc. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/11499/10356 https://doi.org/10.1002/sca.21213 |
ISSN: | 0161-0457 |
Appears in Collections: | Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Koleksiyonu PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
sca.21213.pdf | 811 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
10
checked on Oct 13, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
7
checked on Nov 22, 2024
Page view(s)
28
checked on Aug 24, 2024
Download(s)
36
checked on Aug 24, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.