Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/10356
Title: An assessment of shear bond strength between ceramic repair systems and different ceramic infrastructures
Authors: Kocaağaoğlu, Hasan Hüseyin
Gürbulak, A.
Keywords: ceramic repair
ceramics
dentistry
Alumina
Bond strength (materials)
Ceramic materials
Dentistry
Glass
Glass ceramics
Mechanical testing
Precious metal alloys
Precious metals
Silicate minerals
Strengthening (metal)
Zirconia
Ceramic restorations
Ceramics
Confidence interval
Cylindrical specimens
Infrastructure materials
Kruskal-Wallis tests
Non-precious metals
Shear bond strengths
Repair
acrylic acid resin
alloy
aluminum oxide
dental ceramics
dental material
galvano
resin cement
unclassified drug
zirconium oxide
adhesion
Article
confidence interval
dental bonding
evaluation study
Kruskal Wallis test
priority journal
rank sum test
scanning electron microscopy
shear bond strength
shear strength
statistical analysis
Publisher: John Wiley and Sons Inc.
Abstract: Summary The purpose of this study was to evaluate of shear bond strengths between two ceramic repair systems and different ceramic infrastructure materials. One hundred cylindrical specimens of ceramic infrastructure were fabricated with non precious metal alloy, zirconia, alumina, galvano, and glass ceramic: 20 non precious metal alloy (NP), 20 zirconia (Z), 20 alumina (A), 20 galvano (G), and 20 glass ceramic (GC). Specimens were divided into 2 subgroups. One half of the specimens were applied by Clearfil™ (CR) repair system and, another half of that were applied by Cimara&Cimara® Zircon (CZ) repair system. Bonded specimens were stored in 37°C distilled water for 24 h and were thermocycled at 5-55°C for 1,200 cycles with a 30-sec dwell time and 5-sec transfer time. Shear bond strengths were determined with a mechanical testing device. And mode of failure was recorded. Mann Whitney-U and Kruskal Wallis tests were applied to the data at 95% confidence interval level. Infrastructure groups displayed the following values in megapascals: NP = 10.70 ± 1.88; Z = 9.15 ± 0.80; A = 11.65 ± 0.70; GC = 10.95 ± 0.80; and G = 6.88 ± 0.88. The Mann Whitney-U test results showed no significant difference between the repair systems. The Kruskal Wallis test results demonstrated significant difference between the infrastructures. The lowest bond strength values were observed in G group. In conclusion, average bond strength values were in accordance with previously reported values, therefore it can be suggested that intraoral repair of ceramic restorations can be temporary, but a satisfying alternative for patients. SCANNING 37:300-305, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/10356
https://doi.org/10.1002/sca.21213
ISSN: 0161-0457
Appears in Collections:Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
sca.21213.pdf811 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

10
checked on May 5, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

7
checked on Jul 10, 2024

Page view(s)

26
checked on May 27, 2024

Download(s)

30
checked on May 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.