Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11499/25873
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Özdede, Melih | - |
dc.contributor.author | Peker, İlkay | - |
dc.contributor.author | Altunkaynak, Bülent | - |
dc.contributor.author | Üçok, Özlem | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-09-09T13:58:14Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-09-09T13:58:14Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1302-5805 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11499/25873 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.414128 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: Radiology reports are the most important method of communication between the clinician and the radiologist. In dentomaxillofacial radiology, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) reporting is a new subject. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the satisfaction and expectations of dentists from CBCT reporting as well as contributing to standardization and improvement in the quality of CBCT reports. Materials and Methods: Dentists were invited to participate in the survey by e-mail. The participants filled out a survey with their demographic data and responded to 14 questions regarding CBCT reports. The responses regarding gender, age, title, institution, and department were analysed and compared with chi-square tests. Results: In total, 185 dentists (97 females and 88 males) participated in the study. Participants reported that the adequacy level of the reports were mostly moderate (N:87; 47%) and that the source of adequate reports was university hospitals (N:91; 49.2%). Fifty-seven percent of the surveyors (N:106) reported that they needed a consultant radiologist in clinical practice on a part time basis. There was a statistically significant difference (p<0.05) between participants’ genders, age groups, titles, and departments regarding the source of the adequate reports. Conclusion: The results of this study showed that most of the dentists were not satisfied about the proficiency of CBCT reports. More than half of those surveyed thought that “not reading” the radiology reports might give them a legal liability. Most dentists wanted to consult with the radiologist before and after patient examinations. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Cumhuriyet Dental Journal | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Cumhuriyet Dental Journal | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Cone-beam computed tomography | en_US |
dc.subject | dentistry | en_US |
dc.subject | diagnostic imaging | en_US |
dc.subject | medical writing | en_US |
dc.subject | radiology | en_US |
dc.subject | survey | en_US |
dc.title | The perceptions and attitudes of dentists towards cone-beam computed tomography reports | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 21 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 379 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 386 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.7126/cumudj.414128 | - |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85060516394 | en_US |
dc.identifier.trdizinid | 385702 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q4 | - |
dc.owner | Pamukkale University | - |
item.grantfulltext | open | - |
item.openairetype | Article | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en | - |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
crisitem.author.dept | 06.01. Clinical Sciences | - |
Appears in Collections: | Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Koleksiyonu Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection TR Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / TR Dizin Indexed Publications Collection |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cumhuriyet.pdf | Makale dosyası | 371.67 kB | Adobe PDF | ![]() View/Open |
CORE Recommender
Page view(s)
34
checked on Aug 24, 2024
Download(s)
8
checked on Aug 24, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.