Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/25935
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYavuz, Nilay-
dc.contributor.authorKarkın, Naci-
dc.contributor.authorParlak, İsmet-
dc.contributor.authorSubay, Özlem Özdeşim-
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-11T13:17:25Z
dc.date.available2019-09-11T13:17:25Z
dc.date.issued2018-01-01-
dc.identifier.issn2334-4520-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11499/25935-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4018/IJPADA.2018010105-
dc.description.abstractAlong with the growing use of twitter as a tool of political interaction, recently, there has also been an attention in the academia to understand and explain how and why politicians use twitter, and what its impact on the political outcomes are. On the other hand, there has been little analysis about the content of the tweets that politicians from different parties posted during major political events. Accordingly, this study aims to investigate the discourse strategies that the top-level politicians of the party in power and of the main opposition party in Turkey used in their tweets during Gezi Park events in the summer of 2013. Findings from a hand-coded content analysis based on Van Dijk’s framework (2006) indicate that while the most frequently used strategy was actor descriptions and categorization for both parties’ politicians, burden strategy and lexicalization / metaphor strategy were used significantly more by the main opposition party politicians compared to the politicians of the party in power.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIGI Globalen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age (IJPADA)en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectContent Analysisen_US
dc.subjectDiscourse Analysisen_US
dc.subjectPolitical Communicationen_US
dc.subjectPolitical Polarizationen_US
dc.subjectPolitical Use of Twitteren_US
dc.subjectSocial Mediaen_US
dc.subjectSocial Uprisingsen_US
dc.subjectVan Dijken_US
dc.titlePolitical discourse strategies used in twitter during gezi park protests: A comparison of two rival political parties in Turkeyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.volume5en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage82en_US
dc.identifier.endpage96en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4018/IJPADA.2018010105-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000429239000006en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3-
dc.ownerPamukkale University-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.dept08.02. Political Science and Public Administration-
crisitem.author.dept08.02. Political Science and Public Administration-
crisitem.author.dept08.02. Political Science and Public Administration-
Appears in Collections:İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

58
checked on Aug 24, 2024

Download(s)

38
checked on Aug 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.