Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11499/30022
Title: | Calculation of optimum insulation thickness of external walls in residential buildings by using exergetic life cycle cost assessment method: Case study for Turkey | Authors: | Güven, Şengül | Keywords: | energy saving exergetic environmental impact exergetic life cycle cost assessment optimum insulation thickness Carbon dioxide Cost estimating Energy conservation Environmental impact Glass Global warming Insulating materials Life cycle Mineral wool Rocks Walls (structural partitions) Wool Yarn Carbon dioxide emissions Environmental impact factors Exergetic Heating and cooling Insulation materials Lifecycle costs Optimum insulation thickness Residential building Thermal insulation |
Publisher: | John Wiley and Sons Inc. | Abstract: | Energy is one of the most fundamental event of the universe and it is impossible to imagine an area where energy is not used. The energy demand is also increasing with the ever-increasing population of the world. We also use energy to meet our heating and cooling needs. Heat loss from the exterior walls of buildings is important, so thermal insulation on the wall is very critical. In this study, optimum insulation thickness is determined for four provinces and two different insulation materials selected from four different climatic regions of Turkey. In order to calculate insulation thicknesses, the number of the degree-day and exergetic environmental impact factor have been used. Natural gas is used as fuel. By using exergetic life cycle cost assessment method for rock wool and glass wool as insulation materials, the changes of CO2 emission values, the environmental impact factor, and energy saving values are determined for optimum insulation thickness. The optimum insulation thickness, which are calculated by using the number of the degree-day and exergetic environmental impact factor for glass wool and rock wool is 0.1103 m and 0.04375 m for Antalya, 0.1667 m and 0.07292 m for Isparta, 0.1667 m and 0.0625 m for Bursa, and 0.2188 m and 0.1021 m for Erzurum, respectively. The reduction of carbon dioxide emission values for glass wool and rock wool 86% and 64% for Antalya, 90% and 76% for Isparta, 92% and 82% for Erzurum, and 90% and 73% for Bursa, respectively. Net exergetic environmental impact saving values for glass wool and rock wool: 589 mPts/m2-yr and 342 mPts/m2-yr for Antalya, 1,318 mPts/m2-yr and 642 mPts/m2-yr for Bursa, 1,315 mPts/m2-yr and 878 mPts/m2-yr for Erzurum, and 2,248 mPts/m2-yr and 1,687 mPts/m2-yr for Isparta, respectively. © 2019 American Institute of Chemical Engineers | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/11499/30022 https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.13232 |
ISSN: | 1944-7442 |
Appears in Collections: | Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection Teknoloji Fakültesi Koleksiyonu WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
Show full item record
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
12
checked on Oct 13, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
10
checked on Dec 19, 2024
Page view(s)
42
checked on Aug 24, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.