Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11499/30520
Title: | A comparative study of root canal shaping using protaper universal and protaper next rotary files in preclinical dental education | Authors: | Çelik, G. Kisacik, F.Ö. Yilmaz, E.F. Mersinlioğlu, A. Ertuğrul, İhsan Furkan Orhan, H. |
Keywords: | Education Preclinic Protaper Protaper next Rotary techniques root canal filling material Article dental education dental student human root canal preparation undergraduate student working time |
Publisher: | PeerJ Inc. | Abstract: | Background. Dentistry has undergone an evolution in endodontics practice caused by the advancement of rotary techniques for root canal preparation and their subsequent incorporation into the teaching of dentistry undergraduates. This research aimed to evaluate the shaping ability of third-year dental students as their first experience in rotary instrumentation using ProTaper Universal (PTU) and ProTaper Next (PTN) (Dentsply Maillefer) rotary instruments in simulated curved canals. Methods. Forty students instrumented 200 simulated canals with a 40° curvature in resin blocks according to the manufacturer's instructions with PTU and 39 students and 195 canals with PTN files. The canals were prepared at a speed of 300 rpm using a 16:1 reduction hand-piece powered by an electric motor (Xsmart; Dentsply Maillefer). The final apical preparation was set to F2 for the PTU and X2 for the PTN group. The change in canal curvature was evaluated based on Schneider technique using the AutoCAD 2007 software on post-digital photographs. The incidence of instrument fracture and deformation, the incidence of ledge, the change in working length (WL), and the working time were noted. The data were analyzed with Student's t -test and Chi-Square test at a significance level of 0.05 using SPSS. Results. PTN maintained the original canal curvature better, resulting in fewer fractures and ledges, and shaped the canals faster than the PTU (P <0:05). The mean curves of the resin canals after the instrumentation for the PTU and PTN groups were 24.03° ± 3.14° and 25.64° ± 2.72°, respectively. Thirty-three (17.4%) PTU and 18 (9.3%) PTN files fractured (p<0:05). Nine (4.5%) PTU and 2 (2.6%) PTN deformed (p>0:05). The change in WL after instrumentation was 0.97 mm ± 0.95 mm in PTU and 0.96 mm ± 0.80 mm in PTN (p<0:05). The mean times were 627 s ± 18 s for PTU and 379 s ± 18 s for PTN (p<0:000). Discussion. PTN can be recommended in severely curved root canals in terms of maintenance of the original canal curvature, superior instrument fracture and fewer ledges. Even if training before preparation provides an acceptable level of canal shaping for preclinical students, the use of NiTi rotary instruments should be included in the undergraduate dental curriculum, contributing to an increase in the quality of root canal shaping and, consequently, to an improvement of the clinical experience of students. © 2019 Celik et al. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/11499/30520 https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7419 |
ISSN: | 2167-8359 |
Appears in Collections: | Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Koleksiyonu PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
peerj-7419.pdf | 1.83 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
9
checked on Nov 16, 2024
Page view(s)
60
checked on Aug 24, 2024
Download(s)
32
checked on Aug 24, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.