Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/37003
Title: Determination of ecologically sensitive areas in Denizli province using geographic information systems (GIS) and analytical hierarchy process (AHP)
Authors: Yılmaz, Fırat Çağlar
Zengin, Murat
Tekin Cüre, Cennet
Keywords: Denizli
Ecological planning
Ecological sensitivity
Protection-utilization balance
Ecology
Hierarchical systems
Information systems
Information use
Sensitivity analysis
Analytical Hierarchy Process
Ecological sensitivity analysis
Environmental change
Internal and external factors
Literature survey
Spatial dimension
Vegetation coverage
Geographic information systems
analytical hierarchy process
culture
elevation
environmental change
environmental planning
GIS
sensitivity analysis
algorithm
Article
controlled study
ecological sensitivity
ecosystem monitoring
environmental parameters
geographic information system
information processing
land use
Normalized Difference Vegetation Index
Turkey (republic)
vegetation
vegetation coverage
wetland
ecosystem
environmental monitoring
Denizli [Turkey]
Turkey
Ecosystem
Environmental Monitoring
Geographic Information Systems
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
Abstract: Ecological sensitivity is defined as the ecosystem’s reaction to environmental change caused by internal and external factors. The degree of ecological sensitivity varies in spatial dimension depending on the natural and cultural features. Ecological sensitivity analysis is based on basis of mapping these differences. As a result of the analysis, an important data that can be a base for spatial plans at different scales is provided. In accordance with this aim, Denizli province was selected for the study area in this research. The factors affecting sensitivity were determined by the literature survey, which was conducted by considering the characteristics of the study area. In this context, elevation, slope, aspect, the proximity to water surface, land cover, and vegetation coverage were evaluated as natural factors, and the proximity to primary traffic roads and residential areas as cultural factors. Each factor was spatially grouped by means of geographic information systems (GIS) according to the degree of impact on ecological sensitivity. Scale 1 (lowest ecological sensitivity) to 5 (highest ecological sensitivity) was used for the spatial grouping. A analytical hierarchy process (AHP) was applied to weight the factors. The overlay method was used in line with the weighted scores in order to determine the composite ecological sensitivity. As a result of the study, the area of 286.26 sq km (2.37%) as highly and more sensitive, 5267.47 sq km (43.50%) as moderately sensitive, and 6554.56 sq km (54.13%) as mildly and less sensitive was determined. In line with the results, suggestions for protection-utilization balance were developed. © 2020, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/37003
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08514-9
ISSN: 0167-6369
Appears in Collections:Mimarlık ve Tasarım Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection

Show full item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

23
checked on May 5, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

17
checked on May 14, 2024

Page view(s)

52
checked on May 6, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.