Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/37038
Title: Quantitative computed tomography assessment for systemic sclerosis–related interstitial lung disease: comparison of different methods
Authors: Ufuk, Furkan
Demirci, Mahmut
Altınışık, Göksel
Keywords: Interstitial lung diseases
Multidetector computed tomography
Pulmonary function tests
Quantitative evaluation
Systemic sclerosis
adult
Article
comparative study
correlation coefficient
digital imaging and communications in medicine
disease severity
female
forced expiratory volume
forced vital capacity
high resolution computer tomography
histogram
human
image analysis
interstitial lung disease
lung function test
major clinical study
male
multidetector computed tomography
priority journal
quantitative analysis
receiver operating characteristic
retrospective study
systemic sclerosis
total lung capacity
aged
complication
diagnostic imaging
lung
middle aged
pathophysiology
procedures
severity of illness index
very elderly
vital capacity
x-ray computed tomography
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Female
Forced Expiratory Volume
Humans
Lung
Lung Diseases, Interstitial
Male
Middle Aged
Multidetector Computed Tomography
Respiratory Function Tests
ROC Curve
Scleroderma, Systemic
Severity of Illness Index
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Vital Capacity
Publisher: Springer
Abstract: Objectives: To compare the previously defined six different histogram-based quantitative lung assessment (QLA) methods on high-resolution CT (HRCT) in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc)–related interstitial lung disease (ILD). Methods: The HRCT images of SSc patients with ILD were reviewed, and the visual ILD score (semiquantitative) and the severity of ILD (limited or extensive) were calculated. The QLA score of ILD was evaluated using the previously defined six different methods and parameters (different lung attenuation ranges, skewness, kurtosis, mean lung attenuation, and standard deviation [SD]). Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) were also performed on all patients. Relationships among variables were evaluated using Spearman’s correlation coefficient (r). Diagnostic performance of quantitative methods for the ability to differentiate the limited from extensive ILD was calculated using ROC analysis. Results: Fifty-five patients were included in the study. There was a significant correlation between all quantitative and semiquantitative measurement results (p < 0.0001). The QLA scores revealed a significant correlation with PFT results. The kurtosis value of the voxels between - 200 and - 1024 Hounsfield unit (HU) (Method-5) showed the best correlation with semiquantitative evaluation (r = - 0.740, p < 0.0001). The ROC analysis demonstrated the best performance of SD of the voxels between - 400 and - 950 HU (Method-6) for histogram analysis method and Method-3 (voxels between - 260 and - 600 HU were calculated as ILD) for CT density cutoff methods. Conclusions: All the QLA methods are applicable in assessing the ILD score in SSc patients and have potential importance to differentiate limited from extensive ILD. Key Points: • Quantitative interstitial lung disease assessment helps clinicians to assess systemic sclerosis patients with interstitial lung disease. • Quantitative lung assessment methods are applicable in assessing the interstitial lung disease score in systemic sclerosis patients. • Quantitative lung assessment methods have potential importance in the management of patients. © 2020, European Society of Radiology.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/37038
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06772-2
ISSN: 0938-7994
Appears in Collections:PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection

Show full item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

17
checked on Nov 16, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

19
checked on Nov 21, 2024

Page view(s)

50
checked on Aug 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.