Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11499/37038
Title: | Quantitative computed tomography assessment for systemic sclerosis–related interstitial lung disease: comparison of different methods | Authors: | Ufuk, Furkan Demirci, Mahmut Altınışık, Göksel |
Keywords: | Interstitial lung diseases Multidetector computed tomography Pulmonary function tests Quantitative evaluation Systemic sclerosis adult Article comparative study correlation coefficient digital imaging and communications in medicine disease severity female forced expiratory volume forced vital capacity high resolution computer tomography histogram human image analysis interstitial lung disease lung function test major clinical study male multidetector computed tomography priority journal quantitative analysis receiver operating characteristic retrospective study systemic sclerosis total lung capacity aged complication diagnostic imaging lung middle aged pathophysiology procedures severity of illness index very elderly vital capacity x-ray computed tomography Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Female Forced Expiratory Volume Humans Lung Lung Diseases, Interstitial Male Middle Aged Multidetector Computed Tomography Respiratory Function Tests ROC Curve Scleroderma, Systemic Severity of Illness Index Tomography, X-Ray Computed Vital Capacity |
Publisher: | Springer | Abstract: | Objectives: To compare the previously defined six different histogram-based quantitative lung assessment (QLA) methods on high-resolution CT (HRCT) in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc)–related interstitial lung disease (ILD). Methods: The HRCT images of SSc patients with ILD were reviewed, and the visual ILD score (semiquantitative) and the severity of ILD (limited or extensive) were calculated. The QLA score of ILD was evaluated using the previously defined six different methods and parameters (different lung attenuation ranges, skewness, kurtosis, mean lung attenuation, and standard deviation [SD]). Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) were also performed on all patients. Relationships among variables were evaluated using Spearman’s correlation coefficient (r). Diagnostic performance of quantitative methods for the ability to differentiate the limited from extensive ILD was calculated using ROC analysis. Results: Fifty-five patients were included in the study. There was a significant correlation between all quantitative and semiquantitative measurement results (p < 0.0001). The QLA scores revealed a significant correlation with PFT results. The kurtosis value of the voxels between - 200 and - 1024 Hounsfield unit (HU) (Method-5) showed the best correlation with semiquantitative evaluation (r = - 0.740, p < 0.0001). The ROC analysis demonstrated the best performance of SD of the voxels between - 400 and - 950 HU (Method-6) for histogram analysis method and Method-3 (voxels between - 260 and - 600 HU were calculated as ILD) for CT density cutoff methods. Conclusions: All the QLA methods are applicable in assessing the ILD score in SSc patients and have potential importance to differentiate limited from extensive ILD. Key Points: • Quantitative interstitial lung disease assessment helps clinicians to assess systemic sclerosis patients with interstitial lung disease. • Quantitative lung assessment methods are applicable in assessing the interstitial lung disease score in systemic sclerosis patients. • Quantitative lung assessment methods have potential importance in the management of patients. © 2020, European Society of Radiology. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/11499/37038 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06772-2 |
ISSN: | 0938-7994 |
Appears in Collections: | PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
Show full item record
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
19
checked on Dec 14, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
20
checked on Dec 20, 2024
Page view(s)
50
checked on Aug 24, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.