Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11499/37366
Title: | A comparison of different quadriceps femoris isometric strengthening methods in healthy young women | Authors: | Başakcı Calık, Bilge Gür Kabul, Elif Büke, Meryem Ünver, Fatma Altug, Filiz |
Keywords: | Electrical stimulation Exercise Quadriceps femoris Torque adult Article clinical assessment clinical effectiveness clinical supervision controlled study dynamometry electric potential electrostimulation female galvanic current high voltage pulsed galvanic stimulation human human experiment isokinetic exercise isometric exercise muscle strength normal human physiotherapist physiotherapy quadriceps femoris muscle resistance training torque young adult |
Publisher: | Turkish Physiotherapy Association | Abstract: | Purpose: This study was planned to compare the effectiveness of high voltage pulsed galvanic (HVPG) stimulation, Russian current and isometric exercise on quadriceps femoris (QF) isometric muscle strength in healthy young women. Methods: Forty-six healthy young women were included in the study. Before and after the training, the dominant side QF isometric muscle strength of participants was assessed with the isokinetic dynamometer. The peak torque and average torques of the participants were recorded after the test. The training was planned as HVPG current group (n=16), Russian current group (n=15) and isometric strengthening group (n=15). All treatments were performed under physiotherapist supervision for a total of 15 sessions for three days a week for five weeks. Results: The quadriceps isometric muscle strength was significantly increased in all groups in terms of peak torque and average torque values after training compared to pre-training values (p<0.05). No statistical difference was found between the groups when the peak torque and average torque delta values were compared (p>0.05). Conclusion: The highest rate of change belongs to the HVPG group in terms of increasing the QF isometric muscle strength. Therefore, we recommend using it in clinical practice. © 2020 Turkish Physiotherapy Association. All rights reserved. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/11499/37366 https://doi.org/10.21653/TJPR.526062 |
ISSN: | 2651-4451 |
Appears in Collections: | Fizik Tedavi ve Rehabilitasyon Yüksekokulu Koleksiyonu Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection TR Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / TR Dizin Indexed Publications Collection WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
10.21653-tjpr.526062-1011817 (1).pdf | 237.81 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
3
checked on Nov 16, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
2
checked on Nov 21, 2024
Page view(s)
112
checked on Aug 24, 2024
Download(s)
64
checked on Aug 24, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.