Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/37724
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZora, H-
dc.contributor.authorGüngör, Harun Reşit-
dc.contributor.authorBayrak, Gökhan-
dc.contributor.authorŞavkın, Raziye-
dc.contributor.authorBüker, Nihal-
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-02T12:21:20Z
dc.date.available2021-02-02T12:21:20Z
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.issn2687-4784-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11499/37724-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5606/ehc.2020.76387-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This study aims to compare the effects of mini-midvastus (MMV) versus medial parapatellar (MPP) approach on rapid recovery protocols during total knee arthroplasty (TKA).en_US
dc.description.abstractPatients and methods: This prospective, randomized, single-blinded study was performed in 54 patients (4 males, 50 females; mean age 64.1 +/- 6.4 years) diagnosed as primary knee osteoarthritis and planned for unilateral TKA between May 2018 and March 2019. Patients were randomly assigned as MMV (1 male, 26 females; mean age 65 +/- 6.4 years) and MPP (3 males, 24 females; mean age 63.2 +/- 6.3 years) groups. Rapid recovery TKA protocol and discharge criteria were assembled and all patients were evaluated preoperatively, and at postoperative first and third months. Length of hospital stay (LOS) was recorded for all patients. Hemoglobin and hematocrit values, radiologic assessment of alignment, knee range of motion (ROM), quadriceps muscle strength, visual analog scale (VAS), 30-sec chair-stand test, stair-climb test, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and Short Form-36 (SF-36) were used for evaluations by blinded observers.en_US
dc.description.abstractResults: There was no significant difference in demographic variables between two groups. Operative time in MMV Group (78.1 +/- 2.7 min) was significantly longer than the MPP Group (65.9 +/- 2.6 min) (p<0.0005). LOSs in the MMV and MPP Groups were 27.6 +/- 3.1 hours and 29.1 +/- 6.7 hours with no significant difference. There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative measurements between groups in hemoglobin and hematocrit values, radiologic alignment of components, knee ROM, VAS, 30-sec chair-stand test, stair-climb test, WOMAC, KOOS, and SF-36 evaluations (p>0.05). In terms of quadriceps muscle strength gain, we could not find any difference between groups in pre- and postoperative difference of changes (p>0.05).en_US
dc.description.abstractConclusion: With the use of contemporary rapid recovery protocols during TKA, MMV approach had no superiority over MPP approach when quadriceps muscle strength, LOS, pain, function, and quality of life were assessed. Longer operative time in the MMV approach compared to MPP approach may be considered as a disadvantage.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTURKISH JOINT DISEASES FOUNDATIONen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJOINT DISEASES AND RELATED SURGERYen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectFast-track protocol; midvastus approach; parapatellar approach; rapiden_US
dc.subjectrecovery protocol; total knee arthroplastyen_US
dc.titleDoes mini-midvastus approach have an advantageous effect on rapid recovery protocols over medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.volume31en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage571
dc.identifier.startpage571en_US
dc.identifier.endpage581en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-0721-0890-
dc.authorid0000-0001-9224-996X-
dc.authorid0000-0002-1636-4082-
dc.authorid0000-0001-7259-7983-
dc.identifier.doi10.5606/ehc.2020.76387-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.pmid32962591en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85091556637en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid466821en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000573941100024en_US
dc.identifier.scopusquality--
dc.ownerPamukkale University-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.dept14.01. Surgical Medicine-
crisitem.author.dept16.01. Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation-
crisitem.author.dept16.01. Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation-
crisitem.author.dept16.01. Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation-
Appears in Collections:Fizik Tedavi ve Rehabilitasyon Yüksekokulu Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
TR Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / TR Dizin Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
2020-31-3-571-581-eng.pdf360.5 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

3
checked on Feb 8, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

3
checked on Jan 28, 2025

Page view(s)

132
checked on Feb 8, 2025

Download(s)

36
checked on Feb 8, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.