Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/46655
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTekin, F.-
dc.contributor.authorCan-Akman, T.-
dc.contributor.authorKitis, A.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-09T21:15:38Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-09T21:15:38Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.issn2468-1229-
dc.identifier.issn2468-1210-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.hansur.2021.12.006-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11499/46655-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to determine the validity and reliability of the KFORCE Sens (R) electrogoniometer in the evaluation of wrist proprioception. Wrist position sense was assessed on a Baseline (R) 360 & DEG; universal goniometer and a KFORCE Sens (R) device. The validity and reliability of the KFORCE Sens (R) device for wrist position sense evaluation were investigated by comparing the two data sets. Fifty-three healthy volunteers (39 female, 14 male) with a mean age of 22.83 +/- 1.28 years (range, 21-27 years) were included. Joint position sense test-retest reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient) on KFORCE Sens (R) was very good for all wrist movements. There was a very strong correlation between flexion-extension movements on the dominant side (r = 0.955), and a strong correlation between ulnar- radial deviation movements (r = 0.745). There was also a very strong (r = 0.863) correlation between flexion-extension movements on the non-dominant side and a strong correlation (r = 0.690) between ulnar- radial deviation movements (p < 0.05). Our results showed that the KFORCE Sens (R) device was a valid and reliable evaluation means of assessing wrist position sense. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS on behalf of SFCM.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.ispartofHand Surgery & Rehabilitationen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectPosition senseen_US
dc.subjectProprioceptionen_US
dc.subjectReliabilityen_US
dc.subjectValidityen_US
dc.subjectWristen_US
dc.subjectRangeen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of the validity and reliability of the KFORCE Sens (R) electrogoniometer in evaluation of wrist proprioceptionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.volume41en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage183en_US
dc.identifier.endpage188en_US
dc.authoridCAN AKMAN, TUBA/0000-0001-5230-2009-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.hansur.2021.12.006-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.authorscopusid57203542699-
dc.authorscopusid56623055200-
dc.authorscopusid6506995603-
dc.authorwosidTekin, Fatih/ACF-1584-2022-
dc.identifier.pmid34974162en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85122620322en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000797247500005en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.dept16.01. Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation-
crisitem.author.dept16.01. Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation-
crisitem.author.dept16.01. Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation-
Appears in Collections:Fizik Tedavi ve Rehabilitasyon Yüksekokulu Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
checked on Jun 29, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

2
checked on Jul 10, 2024

Page view(s)

30
checked on May 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.