Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/46795
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKaraokutan, Isil-
dc.contributor.authorOzel, Gulsum Sayin-
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-09T21:16:10Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-09T21:16:10Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.issn2005-7806-
dc.identifier.issn2005-7814-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2022.14.2.78-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11499/46795-
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE. This study aimed to compare the effect of different surface treatments and luting agent types on the shear bond strength of two ceramics to commercially pure titanium (Cp Ti). MATERIALS AND METHODS. A total of 160 Cp Ti specimens were divided into 4 subgroups (n = 40) according to surface treatments received (control, 50 p.m airborne-particle abrasion, 110 p.m airborne-particle abrasion, and tribochemical coating). The cementation surfaces of titanium and all-ceramic specimens were treated with a universal primer. Two cubic all-ceramic discs (lithium disilicate ceramic (LDC) and zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic (ZLC)) were cemented to titanium using two types of resin-based luting agents: self-cure and dual-cure (n = 10). After cementation, all specimens were subjected to 5000 cycles of thermal aging. A shear bond strength (SBS) test was conducted, and the failure mode was determined using a scanning electron microscope. Data were analyzed using three-way ANOVA, and the Tukey-HSD test was used for post hoc comparisons (P < .05). RESULTS. Significant differences were found among the groups based on surface treatment, resin-based luting agent, and ceramic type (P < .05). Among the surface treatments, 50 p.m air-abrasion showed the highest SBS, while the control group showed the lowest. SBS was higher for dual-cure resin-based luting agent than self-cure luting agent. ZLC showed better SBS values than LDC. CONCLUSION. The cementation of ZLC with dual-cure resin-based luting agent showed better bonding effectiveness to commercially pure titanium treated with 50 p.m airborne-particle abrasion. [J Adv Prosthodonten_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKorean Acad Prosthodonticsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Advanced Prosthodonticsen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectBond strengthen_US
dc.subjectHybrid abutmenten_US
dc.subjectLithium silicateen_US
dc.subjectResin-based luting agenten_US
dc.subjectSurface treatmenten_US
dc.subjectRetained Implant Restorationsen_US
dc.subjectFracture-Resistanceen_US
dc.subjectAbutmentsen_US
dc.subjectCementen_US
dc.subjectAdhesionen_US
dc.subjectAlloyen_US
dc.subjectPerformanceen_US
dc.subjectSurvivalen_US
dc.titleEffect of surface treatment and luting agent type on shear bond strength of titanium to ceramic materialsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.volume14en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage78en_US
dc.identifier.endpage87en_US
dc.authoridSAYIN OZEL, Gulsum/0000-0001-8833-5259-
dc.authorid, Isil/0000-0003-1184-7920-
dc.identifier.doi10.4047/jap.2022.14.2.78-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.authorscopusid56520273900-
dc.authorscopusid57203402684-
dc.identifier.pmid35601349en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85129908894en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000798988600003en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.dept06.01. Clinical Sciences-
Appears in Collections:Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
Effect of surface treatment.pdf1.47 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

6
checked on Sep 30, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

4
checked on Sep 24, 2024

Page view(s)

54
checked on Aug 24, 2024

Download(s)

26
checked on Aug 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.