Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/47207
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKevenk, Tahsin Onur-
dc.contributor.authorKoluman, Ahmet-
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-09T21:23:35Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-09T21:23:35Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.issn1018-4619-
dc.identifier.issn1610-2304-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11499/47207-
dc.description.abstractL. monocytogenes, which is recognized among the leading foodborne pathogen has been identified as the causative agent of listeriosis, which causes important symptoms such as abortion, septicemia, and meningitis. In the first stage of our study, the effectiveness of VIDAS LMO2 and ISO 11290:1 methods, which are frequently used today in the diagnosis of this pathogen, were compared in artificially contaminated samples. In the second stage, the presence of L. monocytogenes in ground beef samples sold in the market was revealed by both methods. According to the data achieved in the study, the relative sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, false positive, and false negative of the VIDAS LMO2 method against ISO 11290-1:2017 was found 99.236%, 73,684%, 90%, 0.263%, and 0.007% in ground beef, respectively. Although no significant difference was detected between the two methods, VIDAS LMO2 was found to be superior in terms of analysis time. Since it is known that rapid and reliable diagnosis is very important in food poisoning, the VIDAS method can be preferred more desirable due to this superiority.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherParlar Scientific Publications (P S P)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofFresenius Environmental Bulletinen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectL. monocytogenesen_US
dc.subjectVIDASen_US
dc.subjectLMO2en_US
dc.subjectISO 11290en_US
dc.subjectGround Beefen_US
dc.subjectListeria-Monocytogenesen_US
dc.subjectIdentificationen_US
dc.titleMETHOD VALIDATION AND PREVALENCE OF L. Monocytogenes CONTAMINATION IN GROUND BEEF WITH VIDAS: AS AN ALTERNATIVE METHOD COMPARED WITH ISO 11290en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.volume31en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage2305en_US
dc.identifier.endpage2311en_US
dc.authoridKEVENK, Tahsin Onur/0000-0003-2519-8060-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.authorwosidKEVENK, Tahsin Onur/Z-5858-2019-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000760842200083en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.dept20.03. Biomedical Engineering-
Appears in Collections:Teknoloji Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

40
checked on May 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check





Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.