Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11499/47818
Title: | Effectiveness of different orthodontic adhesives and a universal bonding resin on the bond strength of brackets to different ceramics | Other Titles: | Eficácia de diferentes adesivos ortodônticos e uma resina de ligação universal na resistência adesiva de bráquetes à diferentes cerâmicas | Authors: | Çokakoğlu S. Karaokutan I. |
Keywords: | Bracket Ceramics Hydrophilic bonding resin One-step adhesive |
Publisher: | Universidade Estadual Paulista, Institute of Science and Technology of Sao Jose dos Campos | Abstract: | Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of different adhesives on the shear bond strength (SBS) of brackets bonded to different ceramic materials. Material and Methods: Fifty disk-shaped specimens were produced from lithium disilicate (IPS e.max CAD) and monolithic zirconia (Cercon) materials. Each specimen was polished with a three-step diamond polishing system. The polished ceramic surfaces were conditioned with universal bonding resin (Assure Plus) without pre-treatment, except for two specimens. Central brackets were bonded onto different ceramic specimens with different adhesives as follows: group 1: conventional adhesive onto the lithium disilicate; group 2: one-step adhesive onto the lithium disilicate; group 3: conventional adhesive onto the monolithic zirconia; group 4: one-step adhesive onto the monolithic zirconia. After thermal cycling, the specimens were subjected to the SBS test. The adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores were also recorded to evaluate bond failure type. Kruskal–Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for statistical analysis. Results: There were statistically significant differences among the SBS values (p?0.05). The monolithic zirconia group with universal bonding resin and conventional orthodontic adhesive demonstrated the highest SBS value (6.34 MPa) and ARI scores. The lithium disilicate group showed the lowest SBS value (2.17 MPa) with the same protocol. No adhesive remained on the lithium disilicate specimens. Conclusion: One-step adhesive and universal bonding resin combination should not be considered as an alternative for lithium disilicate and monolithic zirconia restorations. Conventional adhesive and universal bonding resin application can be effective on non-pretreated ceramic surfaces during orthodontic bonding. © 2022, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Institute of Science and Technology of Sao Jose dos Campos. All rights reserved. | URI: | https://doi.org/10.4322/bds.2022.e3073 https://hdl.handle.net/11499/47818 |
ISSN: | 2178-6011 |
Appears in Collections: | Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Koleksiyonu Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
Effectiveness of different orthodontic.pdf | 975.29 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
CORE Recommender
Page view(s)
50
checked on Aug 24, 2024
Download(s)
18
checked on Aug 24, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.