Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/48467
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMisilli, Tuğba-
dc.contributor.authorGönülo, Nihan-
dc.contributor.authorCabadağ, Özge Gizem-
dc.contributor.authorAlmasifar, Lena-
dc.contributor.authorDinç, Derya-
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-09T21:37:52Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-09T21:37:52Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.issn2459-1459-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.818099-
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/481075-
dc.identifier.urihttp://acikerisim.pau.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11499/48467-
dc.description.abstractObjective: This study aimed to compare surface roughness values (Ra) of different posterior composites after pH-cycling and toothbrushing simulation. Methods: Fifty disc-shaped specimens (8x2 mm) were prepared by using three bulk-fill composites [Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior (FBF), SonicFill 2 (SF), X-tra fil (XF)], a flowable [G-aenial Universal Flo (GF)], and a microhybrid composite [Filtek Z250 (Z250)]. After initial roughness (Ra0 ) measurements were performed with a contact profilometer, the samples were subjected to a pH-cycling model for 10 days and Ra1values were recorded. Then, the samples were subjected to toothbrushing simulation for 4 min and final values (Ra2 ) were recorded. From each group, a representative sample was analyzed with an optical profilometer. The values were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with repeated measures on one factor (period) followed by Tukey’s test (p<0.05). Results: Significant differences were found among materials regardless of experimental periods. The lowest Ra values were determined in GF and Z250 groups. The highest value was obtained in SF, but this value was not statistically significant different from that obtained in XF group. Brushing procedure after chemical degradation led to an increase in surface roughness of all materials except FBF, which was not statistically significant. Conclusion: While Ra values showed differences depending on the materials, pH-cycling and toothbrushing simulation did not have a significant effect on these values.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofClinical and Experimental Health Sciencesen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.titleThe Effect of Ph-cycling and Toothbrushing Simulations on Surface Roughness of Bulk-Fill Compositesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.volume11en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage487en_US
dc.identifier.endpage494en_US
dc.departmentPAUen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.33808/clinexphealthsci.818099-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid481075en_US
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.dept06.01. Clinical Sciences-
Appears in Collections:Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
TR Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / TR Dizin Indexed Publications Collection
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
document (7).pdf2.35 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

36
checked on May 27, 2024

Download(s)

8
checked on May 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.