Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/51929
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorÇokakoğlu, Serpil-
dc.contributor.authorÇakır, Ezgi-
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-22T18:48:02Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-22T18:48:02Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.issn1434-5293-
dc.identifier.issn1615-6714-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11499/51929-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-023-00481-3-
dc.descriptionArticle; Early Accessen_US
dc.description.abstractObjectivesThis randomized clinical trial aimed to evaluate the effects of digital indirect bonding (DIB) compared to the direct bonding (DB) technique in terms of enamel demineralization and periodontal status.Materials and methodsA total of 24 patients (17 females, 7 males) with a mean age of 13.83 & PLUSMN; 1.55 years were bonded using DB and DIB techniques using a split-mouth study design. Bonding techniques were randomly allocated to quadrants. Demineralization measurements were performed with the DIAGNOdent pen (Kavo, Biberach, Germany) from four sides (distal, gingival, mesial, and incisal/occlusal) of all brackets immediately after bonding, 1 month (T1), and 6 months (T2) after bonding. Periodontal measurements were taken before bonding and at the same time points (T1 and T2). Data were statistically analyzed with the Mann-Whitney U test to determine possible differences between groups.ResultsIncisal/occlusal sides exhibited the lowest demineralization values at T2. The gingival side of upper centrals, mesial side of upper laterals, and distal sides of upper first premolar and lower laterals brackets bonded with the DIB technique exhibited significantly increased demineralization compared with the DB technique from T0 to T2 (p < 0.05). Periodontal parameters increased 1 month after bonding and decreased during the follow-up. Bonding technique showed no statistically significant difference in plaque index, gingival index, and bleeding on probing values at any time interval.ConclusionThere were many locations around the brackets with significantly higher demineralization after 6 months in patients who received digital indirect bonding compared to the DB group. Although periodontal health was generally adequate, complete removal of adhesive flash should be carefully carried out to decrease the risk of demineralization during indirect bonding technique with digital workflows.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipPamukkale University Scientific Research Unit [2020HZDP021]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAcknowledgementsWe thank Kubra Yildirim Inci and Hande Emir for their technical and statistical support, respectively.FundingThis study was supported by the Pamukkale University Scientific Research Unit with project number 2020HZDP021.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUrban & Vogelen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Orofacial Orthopedics-Fortschritte Der Kieferorthopadieen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectTooth demineralizationen_US
dc.subjectDental cariesen_US
dc.subjectDental white spotsen_US
dc.subjectExcessive adhesive flashen_US
dc.subjectOrthodontic bracketsen_US
dc.subjectOrthodontic Treatmenten_US
dc.subjectPrevalenceen_US
dc.subjectBracketsen_US
dc.subjectDeviceen_US
dc.titleComparison of enamel demineralization and periodontal status between direct and digital indirect bonding techniques A split-mouth clinical trial of direct vs. digital indirect bondingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.departmentPamukkale Universityen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00056-023-00481-3-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.authorscopusid55874703500-
dc.authorscopusid57194432951-
dc.identifier.pmid37378839en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85163486200en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001018076300001en_US
dc.institutionauthor-
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.dept06.01. Clinical Sciences-
Appears in Collections:Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

1
checked on Nov 21, 2024

Page view(s)

48
checked on Aug 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.