Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/57399
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorÇokakoğlu, Serpil-
dc.contributor.authorNalçacı, Ruhi-
dc.contributor.authorTozlu, Murat-
dc.contributor.authorAltıntaş, Subutay Han-
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-29T13:49:30Z-
dc.date.available2024-06-29T13:49:30Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.issn2321-4600-
dc.identifier.issn2321-1407-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.25259/APOS_57_2023-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11499/57399-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This in vitro study evaluated the shear bond strength (SBS) of aligner attachments bonded to primary teeth with different techniques and composites. Material and Methods: Eighty attachments were prepared using five composites: An aligner composite (GC aligner connect [GAC'), two flowable restorative composites (G-aenial universal injectable and Estelite universal super low flow), and two one-step orthodontic composites integrated with primer (GC ortho connect flow and GC ortho connect). Aligner and restorative composites were applied with self- or total-etch (SE or TE) modes of universal adhesive (G-Premio Bond). Self-adhering composites integrated with primer were applied after acid etching. Excessive composites were removed with tungsten carbide burs after the polymerization of resin attachments. All primary teeth were exposed to thermocycling. Bond strength was determined with a universal testing machine. Remnant resin attachment was scored with the resin attachment remnant index. Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney, and Chi-square tests were used for statistical analyses. Results: The self-etching technique demonstrated lower SBS values compared to total-etching and self-adhering groups regardless of composite type. The highest SBS was found with aligner composite (GAC) and the totaletching technique. Self-adhering composites showed sufficiently high SBS values comparable with GAC and TE bonding techniques. The amount of remnant attachment was significantly higher in the total-etching and selfadhering groups compared to SE bonding with GAC (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Self-adhering orthodontic composites can be preferred to simplify the bonding of aligner attachments to primary enamel after acid etching.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherScientific Scholar Llcen_US
dc.relation.ispartofApos Trends In Orthodonticsen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAligneren_US
dc.subjectAttachmenten_US
dc.subjectBondingen_US
dc.subjectPrimary teethen_US
dc.subjectClear Alignersen_US
dc.subjectEtchen_US
dc.titleWhat is the most effective technique and composite for bonding aligner attachments to primary enamel?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.volume14en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage35en_US
dc.identifier.endpage41en_US
dc.departmentPamukkale Universityen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.25259/APOS_57_2023-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001199890800008en_US
dc.institutionauthor-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.dept06.01. Clinical Sciences-
Appears in Collections:Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.