Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/5749
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTarhan, O.-
dc.contributor.authorAlacacioglu, A.-
dc.contributor.authorSomali, I.-
dc.contributor.authorSipahi, H.-
dc.contributor.authorZencir, M.-
dc.contributor.authorErten, C.-
dc.contributor.authorDirioz, M.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-16T12:02:24Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-16T12:02:24Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.issn1428-2526-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11499/5749-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5114/wo.2011.25655-
dc.description.abstractAim of the study: The purpose of this study is to investigate the complementary/alternative medicine (CAM) usage and the factors affecting this among cancer patients in the western region of Turkey. 220 adult cancer patients participated in the study and 93 patients (42.3%) were found to use at least one CAM method. Material and methods: Our study was done by face-to-face communication in a university hospital, in Turkey. Oncology patients' primary diseases, sociodemographic characteristics, complementary alternative medicine usage, psychological conditions and quality of life were evaluated with proper psychological scales. Patients using and not using CAM were compared with respect to Beck Depression, State Trait Anxiety and Beck Hopelessness scores. No statistically significant difference was detected between/among the groups in BDI (12.0 ±8.4, 11.9 ±8.7, p = 0.96), BHS (5.5 ±4.9, 4.8 ±4.4, p = 0.27) or STAI (43.7 ±8.0, 44.3 ±8.2, p = 0.64) scores. Patients using and not using CAM were compared with respect to WHOQOL-BREF quality of life scores. There was no statistically significant difference between/among the groups in WHOQOL-BREF sub-group scores (physical, psychological, social relations, environment, standardized by culture (environment), general health). Results: Nearly half of the patients (42.3%) in this region were found to be using at least one of the CAM methods. The patients mostly preferred herbal methods, with the leading product being stinging nettle (Urtica dioica). The severity of disease (recurrence and dissemination) and patients' knowledge of the diagnoses were the most important factors affecting the CAM usage. Conclusions: The usage of CAM by oncology patients and the effects of CAM on the present medication prescribed by oncology practitioners must be remembered when they are admitted to polyclinics. Also it must be known that patients with advanced stage and patients with recurrence are more likely to use complementary alternative medications than early stage patients. Therefore oncology patients must be informed about CAM besides their clinical situations. At least physicians should give answers about the CAM to their patients.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofWspolczesna Onkologiaen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAnxietyen_US
dc.subjectCancer patientsen_US
dc.subjectComplementary/alternative medicine (CAM)en_US
dc.subjectDepressionen_US
dc.subjectQuality of lifeen_US
dc.subjectherbaceous agenten_US
dc.subjectadulten_US
dc.subjectageden_US
dc.subjectalternative medicineen_US
dc.subjectanxietyen_US
dc.subjectarticleen_US
dc.subjectBeck Depression Inventoryen_US
dc.subjectBeck Hopelessness Scaleen_US
dc.subjectcancer invasionen_US
dc.subjectcancer patienten_US
dc.subjectcancer recurrenceen_US
dc.subjectcultural factoren_US
dc.subjectdepressionen_US
dc.subjectdisease severityen_US
dc.subjectenvironmental factoren_US
dc.subjectfemaleen_US
dc.subjecthealth care utilizationen_US
dc.subjecthealth statusen_US
dc.subjectherbal medicineen_US
dc.subjecthoneyen_US
dc.subjecthumanen_US
dc.subjecthuman relationen_US
dc.subjectknowledgeen_US
dc.subjectmajor clinical studyen_US
dc.subjectmaleen_US
dc.subjectpatient attitudeen_US
dc.subjectphysical capacityen_US
dc.subjectpsychological well beingen_US
dc.subjectquality of lifeen_US
dc.subjectState Trait Anxiety Inventoryen_US
dc.subjectTurkey (republic)en_US
dc.subjectuniversity hospitalen_US
dc.subjectUrtica dioicaen_US
dc.subjectutilization reviewen_US
dc.titleThe association of complementary alternative medicine use with anxiety, depression and quality of life in Turkish cancer patientsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.volume15en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.startpage274
dc.identifier.startpage274en_US
dc.identifier.endpage278en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5114/wo.2011.25655-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-82555194514en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000297526000004en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4-
dc.ownerPamukkale University-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.dept09.07. Social Sciences and Turkish Language Teaching-
Appears in Collections:Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
WO_Art_17672-10.pdf89.8 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

3
checked on Dec 14, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

3
checked on Dec 20, 2024

Page view(s)

46
checked on Aug 24, 2024

Download(s)

6
checked on Aug 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.