Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11499/5749
Title: | The association of complementary alternative medicine use with anxiety, depression and quality of life in Turkish cancer patients | Authors: | Tarhan, O. Alacacioglu, A. Somali, I. Sipahi, H. Zencir, M. Erten, C. Dirioz, M. |
Keywords: | Anxiety Cancer patients Complementary/alternative medicine (CAM) Depression Quality of life herbaceous agent adult aged alternative medicine anxiety article Beck Depression Inventory Beck Hopelessness Scale cancer invasion cancer patient cancer recurrence cultural factor depression disease severity environmental factor female health care utilization health status herbal medicine honey human human relation knowledge major clinical study male patient attitude physical capacity psychological well being quality of life State Trait Anxiety Inventory Turkey (republic) university hospital Urtica dioica utilization review |
Abstract: | Aim of the study: The purpose of this study is to investigate the complementary/alternative medicine (CAM) usage and the factors affecting this among cancer patients in the western region of Turkey. 220 adult cancer patients participated in the study and 93 patients (42.3%) were found to use at least one CAM method. Material and methods: Our study was done by face-to-face communication in a university hospital, in Turkey. Oncology patients' primary diseases, sociodemographic characteristics, complementary alternative medicine usage, psychological conditions and quality of life were evaluated with proper psychological scales. Patients using and not using CAM were compared with respect to Beck Depression, State Trait Anxiety and Beck Hopelessness scores. No statistically significant difference was detected between/among the groups in BDI (12.0 ±8.4, 11.9 ±8.7, p = 0.96), BHS (5.5 ±4.9, 4.8 ±4.4, p = 0.27) or STAI (43.7 ±8.0, 44.3 ±8.2, p = 0.64) scores. Patients using and not using CAM were compared with respect to WHOQOL-BREF quality of life scores. There was no statistically significant difference between/among the groups in WHOQOL-BREF sub-group scores (physical, psychological, social relations, environment, standardized by culture (environment), general health). Results: Nearly half of the patients (42.3%) in this region were found to be using at least one of the CAM methods. The patients mostly preferred herbal methods, with the leading product being stinging nettle (Urtica dioica). The severity of disease (recurrence and dissemination) and patients' knowledge of the diagnoses were the most important factors affecting the CAM usage. Conclusions: The usage of CAM by oncology patients and the effects of CAM on the present medication prescribed by oncology practitioners must be remembered when they are admitted to polyclinics. Also it must be known that patients with advanced stage and patients with recurrence are more likely to use complementary alternative medications than early stage patients. Therefore oncology patients must be informed about CAM besides their clinical situations. At least physicians should give answers about the CAM to their patients. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/11499/5749 https://doi.org/10.5114/wo.2011.25655 |
ISSN: | 1428-2526 |
Appears in Collections: | Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
WO_Art_17672-10.pdf | 89.8 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
3
checked on Dec 14, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
3
checked on Dec 20, 2024
Page view(s)
46
checked on Aug 24, 2024
Download(s)
6
checked on Aug 24, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.