Perceptions and surgical approaches of periodontists and residency students for bone augmentation procedures

Abstract

Aim: Bone deficiency due to various systemic and periodontal diseases, trauma, and tumors remains a major challenge for osseointegration in implant therapies. To provide implant survival, sufficient bone volume is mandatory. The purpose of the present study is to assess the techniques used by periodontists in implant applications, treatment plans, and solutions to the complications they experience. Material and Methods: 126 periodontists and/or residency students participated in this study. A questionnaire consisting of 20 questions was used. The knowledge and treatment methods about the technique, materials, and planning they use in bone regeneration and the management of complications were questioned. Descriptive statistics and the Pearson Chi-square test were used to analyze the data. Results: All participants needed bone regeneration in implant cases. The most used material for regeneration by the participants was xenograft, with 43.5%. The most preferred application in bone regeneration is guided bone regeneration (GBR) using the collagen membrane, with a rate of 78.3%. The most common complication was membrane exposure. In order to prevent complications, 77.3% of the participants performed adequate soft tissue release, while 63.6% controlled periodontitis. The most commonly used treatment option for complications was the use of postoperative antibiotics/antiseptics. 82.6% of the participants received support in the management of complications. Conclusion: In our study, it was observed that periodontists frequently chose different planning methods and treatment options when performing bone reconstruction/regeneration. It will be beneficial for periodontists to include the latest treatment models applied in the current literature in periodontology residency education.