Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/57901
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKaraokutan, Isil-
dc.contributor.authorAyvaz, Ilayda-
dc.contributor.authorOzel, Gulsum Sayin-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-30T15:26:36Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-30T15:26:36Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.issn1059-941X-
dc.identifier.issn1532-849X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13934-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11499/57901-
dc.description.abstractPurpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of mechanical roughening, adhesive applications, and aging on the bonding between CAD-CAM denture base materials with distinct chemical contents and hard relining material. Materials and Methods A total of 300 denture base specimens were produced by additive, subtractive, and conventional heat-polymerization techniques (N = 100). The specimens have been classified into five subgroups based on the particular surface treatments administered (n = 20): (1) Hard relining material's adhesive application (control); (2) Tungsten carbide bur application for 1 min, and hard reline material's adhesive application; (3) Airborne-particle abrasion (APA) with 110 mu m Al2O3, and hard reline material's adhesive application; (4) Scotchbond Universal application; and (5) Visio.link application. Representative specimens from each subgroup were examined under a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). Subsequently, self-cure hard relining material was condensed in the center of the specimens. Half of the specimens were thermally aged with 5000 cycles at 5 degrees C-55 degrees C. The shear bond strength (SBS) test was performed, and failure loads were recorded. The data was evaluated by Robust ANOVA and Bonferroni test (p < 0.05). Results No statistically significant difference was obtained between the production techniques (p = 0.051). The lowest SBS was observed in the control group among surface treatments, while mechanical surface treatments and universal adhesive showed the highest SBS for both aged and non-aged groups. Aging caused a significant decrease for all test groups (p = 0.001). Conclusions Mechanical surface treatments and universal adhesive applications are more effective for maintaining adhesion across all production techniques.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of prosthodontics-implant esthetic and reconstructive dentistryen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectadhesionen_US
dc.subjectcomputer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturingen_US
dc.subjectdenture basesen_US
dc.subjectgeriatric dentistryen_US
dc.subjecthard relining materialen_US
dc.subject3D printingen_US
dc.subjectBond Strengthen_US
dc.subjectSoft Linersen_US
dc.subjectResinen_US
dc.subjectPolymerizationen_US
dc.subjectZirconiaen_US
dc.subjectTeethen_US
dc.subjectPmmaen_US
dc.titleEffect of adhesives and mechanical surface treatments on the hard relining of CAD-CAM denture basesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.typeArticle; Early Accessen_US
dc.departmentPamukkale Universityen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jopr.13934-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.authorscopusid56520273900-
dc.authorscopusid58899617900-
dc.authorscopusid57203402684-
dc.authorwosidKaraokutan, Işıl/IVU-7794-2023-
dc.identifier.pmid39215615en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85202876899en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001303979200001en_US
dc.institutionauthor-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.openairetypeArticle; Early Access-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.dept06.01. Clinical Sciences-
crisitem.author.dept06.01. Clinical Sciences-
Appears in Collections:Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
Effect of adhesives and mechanical.pdf1.12 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

144
checked on Feb 8, 2025

Download(s)

60
checked on Feb 8, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.