Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/57901
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKaraokutan, Isil-
dc.contributor.authorAyvaz, Ilayda-
dc.contributor.authorOzel, Gulsum Sayin-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-30T15:26:36Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-30T15:26:36Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.issn1059-941X-
dc.identifier.issn1532-849X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13934-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11499/57901-
dc.description.abstractPurpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of mechanical roughening, adhesive applications, and aging on the bonding between CAD-CAM denture base materials with distinct chemical contents and hard relining material. Materials and Methods A total of 300 denture base specimens were produced by additive, subtractive, and conventional heat-polymerization techniques (N = 100). The specimens have been classified into five subgroups based on the particular surface treatments administered (n = 20): (1) Hard relining material's adhesive application (control); (2) Tungsten carbide bur application for 1 min, and hard reline material's adhesive application; (3) Airborne-particle abrasion (APA) with 110 mu m Al2O3, and hard reline material's adhesive application; (4) Scotchbond Universal application; and (5) Visio.link application. Representative specimens from each subgroup were examined under a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). Subsequently, self-cure hard relining material was condensed in the center of the specimens. Half of the specimens were thermally aged with 5000 cycles at 5 degrees C-55 degrees C. The shear bond strength (SBS) test was performed, and failure loads were recorded. The data was evaluated by Robust ANOVA and Bonferroni test (p < 0.05). Results No statistically significant difference was obtained between the production techniques (p = 0.051). The lowest SBS was observed in the control group among surface treatments, while mechanical surface treatments and universal adhesive showed the highest SBS for both aged and non-aged groups. Aging caused a significant decrease for all test groups (p = 0.001). Conclusions Mechanical surface treatments and universal adhesive applications are more effective for maintaining adhesion across all production techniques.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of prosthodontics-implant esthetic and reconstructive dentistryen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectadhesionen_US
dc.subjectcomputer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturingen_US
dc.subjectdenture basesen_US
dc.subjectgeriatric dentistryen_US
dc.subjecthard relining materialen_US
dc.subject3D printingen_US
dc.subjectBond Strengthen_US
dc.subjectSoft Linersen_US
dc.subjectResinen_US
dc.subjectPolymerizationen_US
dc.subjectZirconiaen_US
dc.subjectTeethen_US
dc.subjectPmmaen_US
dc.titleEffect of adhesives and mechanical surface treatments on the hard relining of CAD-CAM denture basesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.typeArticle; Early Accessen_US
dc.departmentPamukkale Universityen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jopr.13934-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.authorscopusid56520273900-
dc.authorscopusid58899617900-
dc.authorscopusid57203402684-
dc.authorwosidKaraokutan, Işıl/IVU-7794-2023-
dc.identifier.pmid39215615en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85202876899en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001303979200001en_US
dc.institutionauthor-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.openairetypeArticle; Early Access-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.dept06.01. Clinical Sciences-
crisitem.author.dept06.01. Clinical Sciences-
Appears in Collections:Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
Effect of adhesives and mechanical.pdf1.12 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.