Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/6914
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKitiş, Ali-
dc.contributor.authorCelik, E.-
dc.contributor.authorAslan, Ummuhan Baş-
dc.contributor.authorZencir, M.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-16T12:12:51Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-16T12:12:51Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.issn0003-6870-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11499/6914-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2008.04.005-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire is a self-administered region-specific outcome instrument developed as a measure of self-rated upper-extremity disability and symptoms. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and the construct validity of the DASH questionnaire by establishing its correlation to the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) in industry workers. Also we aimed to investigate whether the DASH can be used as a standardized questionnaire to evaluate the work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) in upper extremity in industrial settings and epidemiological studies. Material and methods: The Turkish version's reliability and construct validity were evaluated in 240 industry workers with upper-extremity musculoskeletal complaints. Workers were asked to complete a packet that included the DASH and the SF-36. Test-retest reliability was assessed in all workers who filled in the DASH questionnaire 15 days later. Construct validity was evaluated by comparing the overall and work component DASH scores with SF-36 summary and subscales. Results: The mean DASH score for the textile workers whose duties were confection, dyeing, sewing, quality control and packaging was calculated as 65, 55, 68, 54 and 67, respectively. As a result of this study, pain intensity in shoulder, wrist and hand was significantly associated with the DASH score (p<0.05). Internal consistency of the DASH was high (Cronbach alpha 0.91). Test-retest reliability was excellent for the overall DASH (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.92). Moderate correlations (p<0.05) were found between the overall and work component DASH and the SF-36 summary scales. Pearson correlation coefficients of the overall and work component DASH to the SF-36 subscales ranged from -0.33 to -0.82. Conclusion: These results support that DASH is a reliable and valid instrument to measure functional disability and investigate the ergonomic risk factors in textile workers with upper-extremity musculoskeletal complaints. Crown Copyright © 2008.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofApplied Ergonomicsen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectDASHen_US
dc.subjectErgonomicsen_US
dc.subjectMusculoskeletal disordersen_US
dc.subjectTextile industryen_US
dc.subjectUpper extremityen_US
dc.subjectCorrelation methodsen_US
dc.subjectDiseasesen_US
dc.subjectMusculoskeletal systemen_US
dc.subjectNeuromuscular rehabilitationen_US
dc.subjectReliabilityen_US
dc.subjectReliability analysisen_US
dc.subjectRisk assessmenten_US
dc.subjectSurveysen_US
dc.subjectTextilesen_US
dc.subjectEpidemiological studiesen_US
dc.subjectIntraclass correlation coefficientsen_US
dc.subjectMusculoskeletal symptomsen_US
dc.subjectPearson correlation coefficientsen_US
dc.subjectWork-related musculoskeletal disorder (WMSDs)en_US
dc.subjectQuality controlen_US
dc.subjectarmen_US
dc.subjectarticleen_US
dc.subjectclinical assessment toolen_US
dc.subjectclinical evaluationen_US
dc.subjectconstruct validityen_US
dc.subjectcontrolled studyen_US
dc.subjectcorrelation analysisen_US
dc.subjectcorrelation coefficienten_US
dc.subjectCronbach alpha coefficienten_US
dc.subjectdisability of arm shoulder hand questionnaireen_US
dc.subjectergonomicsen_US
dc.subjectfemaleen_US
dc.subjecthanden_US
dc.subjecthumanen_US
dc.subjectinternal consistencyen_US
dc.subjectmajor clinical studyen_US
dc.subjectmaleen_US
dc.subjectmusculoskeletal diseaseen_US
dc.subjectquestionnaireen_US
dc.subjectreliabilityen_US
dc.subjectrisk factoren_US
dc.subjectShort Form 36en_US
dc.subjectshoulderen_US
dc.subjecttest retest reliabilityen_US
dc.subjecttextile industryen_US
dc.subjecttextile workeren_US
dc.titleDASH questionnaire for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms in industry workers: A validity and reliability studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.volume40en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage251-
dc.identifier.startpage251en_US
dc.identifier.endpage255en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-6827-1398-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.apergo.2008.04.005-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.pmid18555973en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-56949089305en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000262113600013en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1-
dc.ownerPamukkale University-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.dept16.01. Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation-
crisitem.author.dept18.03. Coach Training-
crisitem.author.dept16.01. Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation-
Appears in Collections:Fizik Tedavi ve Rehabilitasyon Yüksekokulu Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

76
checked on Jun 22, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

67
checked on Jun 25, 2024

Page view(s)

30
checked on May 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.