Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/7254
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorErdur, Bülent-
dc.contributor.authorErsoy, G.-
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, O.-
dc.contributor.authorOzkutuk, A.-
dc.contributor.authorSis, B.-
dc.contributor.authorKarcioglu, O.-
dc.contributor.authorParlak, I.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-16T12:18:45Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-16T12:18:45Z-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.issn0735-6757-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11499/7254-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2007.03.030-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This work was conducted to study the prophylactic efficacy of 2 topical antibiotic ointments (mupirocin and nitrofurazone) against wound infection in experimental contaminated crush wounds. Methods: Male Wistar rats underwent two 2-cm incisions at the back side and randomized into 3 groups-placebo (n = 14), mupirocin (n = 14), and nitrofurazone (n = 14)-and infected with either Staphylococcus aureus or S pyogenes. All wound edges were crushed for 5 seconds with hemostats to simulate crush injury before inoculation of the microorganisms. Half of the wounds were sutured and the other half left open. These wounds were treated 3 times daily for 6 days with topical mupirocin, nitrofurazone, or petrolatum (as placebo). At the end of 6 days, excisional biopsies were taken from wound edges and histopathologic assessments were made based on neutrophilic infiltration, edema formation, myofibroblastic proliferation, and granulation tissue formation. For the microbiologic assessments, quantitative tissue cultures were made. Results: In S aureus-inoculated wounds, mupirocin showed higher antibacterial activity against bacterial colonization and reduced infection rates compared to placebo groups. The same effect was observed for the infection rates in S pyogenes-inoculated wounds. In S pyogenes-inoculated open wounds, nitrofurazone showed higher antibacterial activity against infection, but this effect was not observed in closed wounds. In S pyogenes- and S aureus-infected wounds, mupirocin treatment significantly lowered infection rates compared to nitrofurazone treatment. Histopathologic examination showed higher myofibroblastic proliferation and higher volume of granulation tissue in the nitrofurazon groups compared to the mupirocin groups. Conclusion: Topical mupirocin application was effective against crush wound infections inoculated with S pyogenes and S aureus. Nitrofurazone provides better granulation tissue formation, but did not effectively prevent bacterial colonization and infection in crush contaminated wounds. © 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal of Emergency Medicineen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectnitrofuralen_US
dc.subjectpetrolatumen_US
dc.subjectpseudomonic aciden_US
dc.subjectanimal experimenten_US
dc.subjectanimal modelen_US
dc.subjectanimal tissueen_US
dc.subjectantibacterial activityen_US
dc.subjectantibiotic prophylaxisen_US
dc.subjectarticleen_US
dc.subjectcell proliferationen_US
dc.subjectcontrolled studyen_US
dc.subjectcrush traumaen_US
dc.subjectdrug efficacyen_US
dc.subjectedemaen_US
dc.subjectgranulation tissueen_US
dc.subjecthistopathologyen_US
dc.subjectinoculationen_US
dc.subjectmaleen_US
dc.subjectmyofibroblasten_US
dc.subjectneutrophil chemotaxisen_US
dc.subjectnonhumanen_US
dc.subjectointmenten_US
dc.subjectpriority journalen_US
dc.subjectquantitative analysisen_US
dc.subjectraten_US
dc.subjectStaphylococcus aureusen_US
dc.subjectStreptococcus pyogenesen_US
dc.subjecttissue cultureen_US
dc.subjecttreatment outcomeen_US
dc.subjectwound infectionen_US
dc.subjectAdministration, Topicalen_US
dc.subjectAnimalsen_US
dc.subjectAnti-Bacterial Agentsen_US
dc.subjectMaleen_US
dc.subjectMupirocinen_US
dc.subjectNitrofurazoneen_US
dc.subjectRatsen_US
dc.subjectRats, Wistaren_US
dc.subjectStaphylococcal Skin Infectionsen_US
dc.subjectTreatment Outcomeen_US
dc.subjectWound Infectionen_US
dc.subjectWounds and Injuriesen_US
dc.titleA comparison of the prophylactic uses of topical mupirocin and nitrofurazone in murine crush contaminated woundsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.volume26en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage137-
dc.identifier.startpage137en_US
dc.identifier.endpage143en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ajem.2007.03.030-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.pmid18272091en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-38949216325en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000253392600004en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1-
dc.ownerPamukkale University-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.dept14.02. Internal Medicine-
crisitem.author.dept14.02. Internal Medicine-
Appears in Collections:PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

8
checked on Jun 29, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

8
checked on Jul 10, 2024

Page view(s)

50
checked on May 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.