Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/7254
Title: A comparison of the prophylactic uses of topical mupirocin and nitrofurazone in murine crush contaminated wounds
Authors: Erdur, Bülent
Ersoy, G.
Yilmaz, Osman
Ozkutuk, A.
Sis, B.
Karcioglu, O.
Parlak, I.
Keywords: nitrofural
petrolatum
pseudomonic acid
animal experiment
animal model
animal tissue
antibacterial activity
antibiotic prophylaxis
article
cell proliferation
controlled study
crush trauma
drug efficacy
edema
granulation tissue
histopathology
inoculation
male
myofibroblast
neutrophil chemotaxis
nonhuman
ointment
priority journal
quantitative analysis
rat
Staphylococcus aureus
Streptococcus pyogenes
tissue culture
treatment outcome
wound infection
Administration, Topical
Animals
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Male
Mupirocin
Nitrofurazone
Rats
Rats, Wistar
Staphylococcal Skin Infections
Treatment Outcome
Wound Infection
Wounds and Injuries
Abstract: Objectives: This work was conducted to study the prophylactic efficacy of 2 topical antibiotic ointments (mupirocin and nitrofurazone) against wound infection in experimental contaminated crush wounds. Methods: Male Wistar rats underwent two 2-cm incisions at the back side and randomized into 3 groups-placebo (n = 14), mupirocin (n = 14), and nitrofurazone (n = 14)-and infected with either Staphylococcus aureus or S pyogenes. All wound edges were crushed for 5 seconds with hemostats to simulate crush injury before inoculation of the microorganisms. Half of the wounds were sutured and the other half left open. These wounds were treated 3 times daily for 6 days with topical mupirocin, nitrofurazone, or petrolatum (as placebo). At the end of 6 days, excisional biopsies were taken from wound edges and histopathologic assessments were made based on neutrophilic infiltration, edema formation, myofibroblastic proliferation, and granulation tissue formation. For the microbiologic assessments, quantitative tissue cultures were made. Results: In S aureus-inoculated wounds, mupirocin showed higher antibacterial activity against bacterial colonization and reduced infection rates compared to placebo groups. The same effect was observed for the infection rates in S pyogenes-inoculated wounds. In S pyogenes-inoculated open wounds, nitrofurazone showed higher antibacterial activity against infection, but this effect was not observed in closed wounds. In S pyogenes- and S aureus-infected wounds, mupirocin treatment significantly lowered infection rates compared to nitrofurazone treatment. Histopathologic examination showed higher myofibroblastic proliferation and higher volume of granulation tissue in the nitrofurazon groups compared to the mupirocin groups. Conclusion: Topical mupirocin application was effective against crush wound infections inoculated with S pyogenes and S aureus. Nitrofurazone provides better granulation tissue formation, but did not effectively prevent bacterial colonization and infection in crush contaminated wounds. © 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/7254
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2007.03.030
ISSN: 0735-6757
Appears in Collections:PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection

Show full item record



CORE Recommender

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.