Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/7511
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAlkan, Hakan-
dc.contributor.authorYıldız, Necmettin-
dc.contributor.authorSarsan, Ayşe-
dc.contributor.authorAkkaya, Nuray-
dc.contributor.authorFındıkoğlu, Gülin-
dc.contributor.authorSevinç, Özgür-
dc.contributor.authorTopuz, Oya-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-16T12:29:48Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-16T12:29:48Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.issn1304-2947-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11499/7511-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The aim of this study was to determine whether there is an association between fall risk measured posturographically and clinical balance tests among people who are over 65 years of age, and to identify the discriminative ability of the posturographic fall risk index.en_US
dc.description.abstractMaterials and Methods: Two hundred and twenty participants who were over 65 years of age were included in the study. The balance and fall risk of participants were assessed with the Berg balance scale (BBS) and a posturography device; functional mobility with the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test; lower extremity neuromuscular function with the Chair Stand test (CST) and quality of life with the Short Form-36 (SF-36). Participants were grouped into two, as fallers and non-fallers, on the basis of the past year’s fall history.en_US
dc.description.abstractResults: A total of 78 participant (35.5%) had a history of falling, while 142 (64.5%) of the subjects did not. Age, TUG and posturographic fall risk index of fallers were significantly higher than for nonfallers, whilst some subgroups of the SF-36, BBS and mean CST scores were lower (p<0.05). There were negative correlations between posturographic fall risk and the BBS (r=-0.84) and CST (r=-0.40) yet a positive correlation with the TUG (r=0.67) (p<0.05). Using the agreement between the posturographic fall risk index and history of falls, the area under the ROC curve was 0.818. In this study, when the cut-off value 51? was used, sensitivity was found to be 76.9% and specificity was 73.9%, with a higher value for the Youden index: 0.508.en_US
dc.description.abstractConclusion: It was shown that fallers had poorer balance, functional mobility, lower extremity neuromuscular function and quality of life than nonfallers. The study also demonstrated that posturographically obtained fall risk was significantly correlated with clinical balance tests and had good discriminative ability to identify fallers. © 2014, Geriatrics Society. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherGeriatrics Societyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurk Geriatri Dergisien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAccidental fallsen_US
dc.subjectAgeden_US
dc.subjectPostural balanceen_US
dc.subjectageden_US
dc.subjectArticleen_US
dc.subjectBerg Balance Scaleen_US
dc.subjectbody equilibriumen_US
dc.subjectchair stand testen_US
dc.subjectclinical balance testen_US
dc.subjectclinical examinationen_US
dc.subjectcommunity livingen_US
dc.subjectdiscriminative abilityen_US
dc.subjectfall risken_US
dc.subjectfemaleen_US
dc.subjecthumanen_US
dc.subjectmaleen_US
dc.subjectneuromuscular functionen_US
dc.subjectreceiver operating characteristicen_US
dc.subjectShort Form 36en_US
dc.subjectstabilographyen_US
dc.subjecttetrax interactive balance systemen_US
dc.subjecttimed up and go testen_US
dc.subjectweight fluctuationen_US
dc.titleThe relationship between posturographic fall risk and clinical balance tests among community-dwelling older adultsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.volume17en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage242-
dc.identifier.startpage242en_US
dc.identifier.endpage248en_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-8461-9131-
dc.authorid0000-0002-1947-4375-
dc.authorid0000-0002-6930-6441-
dc.authorid0000-0002-9307-3342-
dc.authorid0000-0002-7431-2918-
dc.authorid0000-0002-3231-8123-
dc.authorid0000-0002-4708-9378-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84907821240en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid200908en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000346741300005en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4-
dc.ownerPamukkale University-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.dept14.02. Internal Medicine-
crisitem.author.dept14.02. Internal Medicine-
crisitem.author.dept14.02. Internal Medicine-
crisitem.author.dept14.02. Internal Medicine-
crisitem.author.dept14.02. Internal Medicine-
crisitem.author.dept14.02. Internal Medicine-
crisitem.author.dept14.02. Internal Medicine-
Appears in Collections:Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
TR Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / TR Dizin Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
49f3eb6a-ee73-44df-b03e-7151a18a5e5f.pdf180.04 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

5
checked on Jan 25, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

5
checked on Jan 29, 2025

Page view(s)

154
checked on Jan 21, 2025

Download(s)

82
checked on Jan 21, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check





Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.