Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11499/7836
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kayihan, G. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Özkan, A. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Köklü, Yusuf | - |
dc.contributor.author | Eyuboğlu, E. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Akça, F. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Koz, M. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ersöz, G. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-08-16T12:32:39Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-08-16T12:32:39Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1232-1087 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11499/7836 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.2478/s13382-014-0237-0 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare values of aerobic performance in the 1-mile run test (1-MRT) using different formulae. Material and Methods: Aerobic capacities of 351 male volunteers working for the Turkish National Police within the age range of 20-23 years were evaluated by the 1-MRT and the 20-metre shuttle run (20-MST). VO 2max values were estimated by the prediction equations developed by George et al. (1993), Cureton et al. (1995) and Kline et al. (1987) for the 1-MRT and by Leger and Lambert (1982) for the 20-MST. Results: The difference between the results of the different formulae was significant (p = 0.000). The correlation coefficient between the estimated VO 2max using Cureton's equation, George's equation, Kline's equation and the 20-MST were 0.691 (p < 0.001), 0.486 (p < 0.001) and 0.608 (p < 0.001), respectively. The highest correlation coefficient was between the VO 2max estimated by the 20-MST and Cureton's equation. Similarly, the highest correlation coefficient (r = -0.779) was between the 1-mile run time and the VO 2max estimated by Cureton's equation. Conclusions: When analysing more vigorous exercise than sub-maximal exercise, we suggest that Cureton's equation be used to predict the VO 2max from 1-mile run/walk performance in large numbers of healthy individuals with high VO 2max . This research compares the use of 3 different formulae to estimate VO 2max from 1-mile run/walk performance in male law enforcement officers aged 20-23 years for the first time and reports the most accurate formula to use when evaluating aerobic capacities of large numbers of healthy individuals. © 2014 Versita Warsaw and Springer-Verlag Wien. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Field aerobic tests | en_US |
dc.subject | Maximal oxygen uptake | en_US |
dc.subject | One mile run test | en_US |
dc.subject | Physical fitness | en_US |
dc.subject | Police officers | en_US |
dc.subject | Young adults | en_US |
dc.subject | anaerobic threshold | en_US |
dc.subject | comparative study | en_US |
dc.subject | Exercise Test | en_US |
dc.subject | Humans | en_US |
dc.subject | Male | en_US |
dc.subject | Mathematical Concepts | en_US |
dc.subject | methods | en_US |
dc.subject | Physical Fitness | en_US |
dc.subject | physiology | en_US |
dc.subject | Police | en_US |
dc.subject | Running | en_US |
dc.subject | Young Adult | en_US |
dc.subject | Anaerobic Threshold | en_US |
dc.title | Comparative analysis of the 1-mile run test evaluation formulae: Assessment of aerobic capacity in male law enforcement officers aged 20-23 years | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 27 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 165 | |
dc.identifier.startpage | 165 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 174 | en_US |
dc.authorid | 0000-0003-2736-9214 | - |
dc.authorid | 0000-0003-2736-9214 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.2478/s13382-014-0237-0 | - |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 24519369 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-84901687004 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000336275600003 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q3 | - |
dc.owner | Pamukkale University | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en | - |
item.openairetype | Article | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
item.grantfulltext | open | - |
crisitem.author.dept | 18.03. Coach Training | - |
Appears in Collections: | PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection Spor Bilimleri Fakültesi Koleksiyonu WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
Comparative analysis of.pdf | 419.22 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
4
checked on Nov 23, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
3
checked on Nov 21, 2024
Page view(s)
40
checked on Aug 24, 2024
Download(s)
20
checked on Aug 24, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.