Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/8741
Title: Application of ATC/DDD methodology to evaluate perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis
Authors: Akalin, S.
Kutlu, Selda Sayın
Cirak, B.
Eskiçorapcı, S.Y.
Bagdatli, D.
Akkaya, S.
Keywords: Appropriateness
ATC-DDD index
Audit
Cost
Perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis
Turkey
amikacin
cefazolin
ceftriaxone
cefuroxime
ciprofloxacin
clindamycin
gentamicin
ornidazole
sultamicillin
vancomycin
antiinfective agent
adult
Anatomic Therapeutic Chemical Defined Daily Doses system
antibiotic prophylaxis
article
calculation
drug choice
drug cost
drug use
female
general surgery
human
major clinical study
male
medical audit
named inventories, questionnaires and rating scales
perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis
practice guideline
prescription
priority journal
surgical infection
surgical technique
surgical ward
Turkey (republic)
university hospital
aged
clinical practice
drug administration
economics
methodology
middle aged
prospective study
standard
statistics
time
Adult
Aged
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Antibiotic Prophylaxis
Drug Administration Schedule
Drug Costs
Female
Hospitals, University
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Physician's Practice Patterns
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Prospective Studies
Time Factors
Young Adult
Publisher: Kluwer Academic Publishers
Abstract: Objective To evaluate quality of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) and to calculate the cost per procedure in a Turkish university hospital. Setting A 352-bed teaching hospital in Denizli, Turkey. Method An prospective audit was performed between July and October 2010. All clean, clean-contaminated and contaminated elective surgical procedures in ten surgical wards were recorded. Antimicrobial use was calculated per procedure using the ATC-DDD system. The appropriateness of antibiotic use for each procedure was evaluated according to international guidelines on PAP. In addition, the cost per procedure was calculated. Results Overall, in 577 of the 625 (92.3%) of the studied procedures, PAP was used. PAP was indicated in 12.5% of the group where it was not used, and not indicated in 7.1% of the group where it was used. Unnecessarily prolonged antimicrobial prophylaxis was observed in 56.9% of the procedures, mean duration was 2.6 ± 2.7 days. The most frequently used antimicrobials were cefazolin (117.9 DDD/100-operation) and sulbactam/ ampicillin (102.2 DDD/100-operation). The timing of the starting dose was appropriate in 545 procedures (94.5%). In the group that received PAP, only 80 (13.7%) of the procedures were found to be fully appropriate and correct. The density of antimicrobial use per operation was 2.8 DDD. The mean cost of the use of prophylactic antimicrobials €18.6 per procedure. Conclusion The density of antimicrobial use in PAP was found to be very high in our hospital. Antibiotic overuse extended into the postoperative period. © 2011 CARS.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/8741
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-011-9601-3
ISSN: 2210-7703
Appears in Collections:PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection

Show full item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

18
checked on Dec 14, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

15
checked on Dec 19, 2024

Page view(s)

28
checked on Aug 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.