Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11499/8963
Title: | Enhancing antibacterial effect of sodium hypochlorite by low electric current-assisted sonic agitation | Authors: | Maden, M. Ertuğrul, İhsan Furkan Orhan, E.O. Erik, C.E. Yetiş, C.Ç. Tuncer, Y. Kahriman, M. |
Keywords: | hypochlorite sodium antiinfective agent disinfectant agent antibacterial activity Article biofilm colony forming unit controlled study decontamination dental device electric current Enterococcus faecalis human human tissue lavage nonhuman sonic agitation tooth root ultrasound dental pulp cavity drug effects electricity endodontic procedure Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections microbiology physiology procedures Anti-Bacterial Agents Biofilms Dental Pulp Cavity Disinfectants Electricity Humans Root Canal Therapy Sodium Hypochlorite Sonication |
Publisher: | Public Library of Science | Abstract: | Background: This research focused on the effects of low electric current (µE)-assisted sonic agitation of sodium hypochlorite on Enterococcus faecalis infected human root dentin. Methods: Extracted human canine roots were instrumented, sterilized, and experimentally contaminated with E. faecalis. After incubation for 21 days, the presence of the biofilm was confirmed by scanning electron microscopy (n = 3). Roots were randomly divided into seven groups according to decontamination procedures: G1: no treatment; G2: sterile saline; G3: 5.25% sodium hypochlorite; G4: passive ultrasonic irrigation; G5: EndoActivator (Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties, Tulsa, OK) agitation (EA); G6: µE agitation; and G7: µE-assisted sonic agitation. Fixed µE amperage and intensities were applied in G6 and G7. Following microbial sampling, bacterial colonies were counted using the direct plating method. Results: Biofilm was not eradicated in any sample. The µE-assisted sonic agitation of sodium hypochlorite revealed the lowest cfu values (p<0.05), whereas there were no significant differences among the passive ultrasonic irrigation, EndoActivator and µE agitation alone (p>0.05). Conclusions: Based on available evidence, the following conclusions were drawn: The µE-assisted sonic agitation increased the antibiofilm efficiency of sodium hypochlorite than passive ultrasonic irrigation and EndoActivator. The µE-assisted sonic agitation on 5.25% sodium hypochlorite is not capable to eradicate biofilms at 10mA energy level in 60s. © 2017 Maden et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/11499/8963 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183895 |
ISSN: | 1932-6203 |
Appears in Collections: | Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Koleksiyonu PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
pone.0183895.pdf | 4.73 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
12
checked on Nov 16, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
9
checked on Nov 21, 2024
Page view(s)
42
checked on Aug 24, 2024
Download(s)
24
checked on Aug 24, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.