Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/8963
Title: Enhancing antibacterial effect of sodium hypochlorite by low electric current-assisted sonic agitation
Authors: Maden, M.
Ertuğrul, İhsan Furkan
Orhan, E.O.
Erik, C.E.
Yetiş, C.Ç.
Tuncer, Y.
Kahriman, M.
Keywords: hypochlorite sodium
antiinfective agent
disinfectant agent
antibacterial activity
Article
biofilm
colony forming unit
controlled study
decontamination
dental device
electric current
Enterococcus faecalis
human
human tissue
lavage
nonhuman
sonic agitation
tooth root
ultrasound
dental pulp cavity
drug effects
electricity
endodontic procedure
Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections
microbiology
physiology
procedures
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Biofilms
Dental Pulp Cavity
Disinfectants
Electricity
Humans
Root Canal Therapy
Sodium Hypochlorite
Sonication
Publisher: Public Library of Science
Abstract: Background: This research focused on the effects of low electric current (µE)-assisted sonic agitation of sodium hypochlorite on Enterococcus faecalis infected human root dentin. Methods: Extracted human canine roots were instrumented, sterilized, and experimentally contaminated with E. faecalis. After incubation for 21 days, the presence of the biofilm was confirmed by scanning electron microscopy (n = 3). Roots were randomly divided into seven groups according to decontamination procedures: G1: no treatment; G2: sterile saline; G3: 5.25% sodium hypochlorite; G4: passive ultrasonic irrigation; G5: EndoActivator (Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties, Tulsa, OK) agitation (EA); G6: µE agitation; and G7: µE-assisted sonic agitation. Fixed µE amperage and intensities were applied in G6 and G7. Following microbial sampling, bacterial colonies were counted using the direct plating method. Results: Biofilm was not eradicated in any sample. The µE-assisted sonic agitation of sodium hypochlorite revealed the lowest cfu values (p<0.05), whereas there were no significant differences among the passive ultrasonic irrigation, EndoActivator and µE agitation alone (p>0.05). Conclusions: Based on available evidence, the following conclusions were drawn: The µE-assisted sonic agitation increased the antibiofilm efficiency of sodium hypochlorite than passive ultrasonic irrigation and EndoActivator. The µE-assisted sonic agitation on 5.25% sodium hypochlorite is not capable to eradicate biofilms at 10mA energy level in 60s. © 2017 Maden et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/8963
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183895
ISSN: 1932-6203
Appears in Collections:Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
pone.0183895.pdf4.73 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

12
checked on Nov 16, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

9
checked on Nov 21, 2024

Page view(s)

42
checked on Aug 24, 2024

Download(s)

24
checked on Aug 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.