Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11499/9205
Title: | Femoral bowing plane adaptation to femoral anteversion | Authors: | Akman, Alp Demirkan, Ahmet Fahir Sabir, Nuran Oto, Murat Yörükoğlu, Ali Çağdaş Kıter, Esat |
Keywords: | anatomy Anteversion anthropometry bowing of femur computerized tomography femoral bowing plane human MeSH terms: Femur x-ray |
Publisher: | Medknow Publications | Abstract: | Background: Femoral bowing plane (FBP) is the unattended subject in the literature. More over the femoral shaft with its bowing is neglected in established anteversion determination methods. There is limited information about the relationship between FBP and anteversion. Thus we focused on this subject and hypothesized that there could be an adaptation of FBP to anteversion. Materials and Methods: FBP is determined on three-dimensional solid models derived from the left femoral computerized tomography data of 47 patients which were taken before for another reason and comparatively evaluated with anteversion. There were 20 women and 27 men. The mean age of patients was 56 years (range 21-84 years). Results: The anteversion values were found as the angle between a distal condylar axis (DCA) and femoral neck anteversion axis (FNAA) along an imaginary longitudinal femoral axis (LFA) in the true cranio-caudal view. The FBP was determined as a plane that passes through the centre-points of three pre-determinated sections on the femoral shaft. The angles between DCA, FNAA and FBP were comparatively evaluated. The independent samples t-test was used for statistical analysis. At the end, it was found that FBP lies nearly perpendicular to the anteversion axis for the mean of our sample which is around 89° in females and 93° in males (range 78-102°). On the other hand, FBP does not lie close to the sagittal femoral plane (SFP); instead, there is an average 12.5° external rotation relative to the SFP. FBP is correlated well with anteversion in terms of FBP inclination from SFP and femoral torsion (i.e., angle between FBP and femoral neck anteversion axis (P0 < 0.001; r = 0.680 and r = -0.682, respectively). Combined correlation is perfect (R[2] = 1) as the FBP, SFP, and posterior femoral plane forms a triangle in the cranio-caudal view. Conclusions: We found that FBP adapts to anteversion. As FBP lies close to perpendicularity for the mean, femoral component positioning perpendicular to the FBP can be an alternate way in the replacement surgeries. In addition, it has been found that FBP lies externally rotated relative to the SFP. © 2017 Indian Journal of Orthopaedics | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/11499/9205 https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.197219 |
ISSN: | 0019-5413 |
Appears in Collections: | PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
10.4103 0019-5413.197219.pdf | 831.18 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
4
checked on Nov 16, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
3
checked on Nov 21, 2024
Page view(s)
46
checked on Aug 24, 2024
Download(s)
34
checked on Aug 24, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.