Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/9636
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorÖztürk, Fırat-
dc.contributor.authorErsöz, M.-
dc.contributor.authorÖztürk, S.A.-
dc.contributor.authorHatunoglu, E.-
dc.contributor.authorMalkoç, S.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-16T13:03:43Z
dc.date.available2019-08-16T13:03:43Z
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.issn0141-5387-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11499/9636-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjv023-
dc.description.abstractSummary Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate microleakage under orthodontic ceramic brackets bonded with direct and different indirect bonding techniques and adhesives using micro-computed tomography. Materials and methods: A total of 30 human maxillary premolars were randomly separated into five groups with six teeth in each group. In group I, teeth were bonded directly with Transbond XT (3M Unitek). In group II, group III, group IV, and group V, teeth were bonded through an indirect technique with Custom I.Q. (Reliance Orthodontic Products), Sondhi Rapid-Set (3M Unitek), RMbond (RMO), and Transbond IDB (3M Unitek), respectively, following the manufacturer's instructions. Micro-CT system model 1172 of Skyscan (Kontich, Belgium) was used to scan all samples. NRecon (Skyscan) version 1.6, CT-Analyser V.1.11 (Skyscan), and TView (SkyScan, Bvba) software programs were used for microleakage evaluation. Microleakage values between the test groups were assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis test, while the Wilcoxon signed rank test was used for within-group comparisons. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05. Results: According to the Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance test, there were no significant differences among the tested groups, with regard to volume and percentage (microleakage/region of interest × 100) of microleakage values (P < 0.05). The Wilcoxon signed rank test showed that coronal microleakage volume and percentage values significantly differed for RMbond and Transbond IDB groups. Limitations: In the study, only ceramic brackets were used and microleakage into mini gaps did not show up on the micro-CT image because 50% silver nitrate solution could not penetrate into mini gaps which are smaller than silver nitrate particles. Conclusion: Use of direct and indirect bonding techniques with different adhesives did not significantly affect the amount of microleakage. © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontic Society.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Orthodonticsen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectbisphenol A bis(2 hydroxypropyl) ether dimethacrylateen_US
dc.subjectbracket adhesiveen_US
dc.subjectcustom I.Q. sealanten_US
dc.subjectdental materialen_US
dc.subjectethoxylated bis-phenol A dimethacrylateen_US
dc.subjectmacrogol derivativeen_US
dc.subjectmethacrylic acid derivativeen_US
dc.subjectpolymethacrylic acid derivativeen_US
dc.subjectresin cementen_US
dc.subjectSondhi Indirect Bonding Resinen_US
dc.subjectTransbonden_US
dc.subjecttriethylene glycol dimethacrylateen_US
dc.subjectceramicsen_US
dc.subjectchemistryen_US
dc.subjectclassificationen_US
dc.subjectcomparative studyen_US
dc.subjectdental bondingen_US
dc.subjectdental light-curingen_US
dc.subjecthumanen_US
dc.subjectmaterials testingen_US
dc.subjectmicro-computed tomographyen_US
dc.subjectorthodontic bracketen_US
dc.subjectorthodontic procedureen_US
dc.subjectpremolar toothen_US
dc.subjectproceduresen_US
dc.subjectrandomizationen_US
dc.subjectsurface propertyen_US
dc.subjecttooth diseaseen_US
dc.subjectBicuspiden_US
dc.subjectBisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylateen_US
dc.subjectCeramicsen_US
dc.subjectDental Bondingen_US
dc.subjectDental Leakageen_US
dc.subjectDental Materialsen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectLight-Curing of Dental Adhesivesen_US
dc.subjectMaterials Testingen_US
dc.subjectMethacrylatesen_US
dc.subjectOrthodontic Appliance Designen_US
dc.subjectOrthodontic Bracketsen_US
dc.subjectPolyethylene Glycolsen_US
dc.subjectPolymethacrylic Acidsen_US
dc.subjectRandom Allocationen_US
dc.subjectResin Cementsen_US
dc.subjectSurface Propertiesen_US
dc.subjectX-Ray Microtomographyen_US
dc.titleMicro-CT evaluation of microleakage under orthodontic ceramic brackets bonded with different bonding techniques and adhesivesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.volume38en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage163
dc.identifier.startpage163en_US
dc.identifier.endpage169en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ejo/cjv023-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.pmid25855655en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84963974251en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000374414300007en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1-
dc.ownerPamukkale University-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
crisitem.author.dept06.01. Clinical Sciences-
crisitem.author.dept27.01. Electronics and Automation-
Appears in Collections:Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
Fırat Öztürk.pdf1.57 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

10
checked on Jun 22, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

9
checked on Jun 22, 2024

Page view(s)

38
checked on May 27, 2024

Download(s)

20
checked on May 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.