Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11499/9638
Title: | Application of several non-linear prediction tools for estimating uniaxial compressive strength of granitic rocks and comparison of their performances | Authors: | Jahed Armaghani, D. Tonnizam Mohamad, E. Hajihassani, M. Yağız, Saffet Motaghedi, H. |
Keywords: | Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system Artificial neural network Granite Non-linear multiple regression Uniaxial compressive strength Compressive strength Forecasting Fuzzy inference Fuzzy systems Mean square error Neural networks Seismic waves Statistical tests Tracking (position) Wave propagation Coefficient of determination Non linear Non-linear predictions Performance indices Ranking procedures Root mean squared errors Rocks |
Publisher: | Springer-Verlag London Ltd | Abstract: | Uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) of rock is crucial for any type of projects constructed in/on rock mass. The test that is conducted to measure the UCS of rock is expensive, time consuming and having sample restriction. For this reason, the UCS of rock may be estimated using simple rock tests such as point load index (Is(50)), Schmidt hammer (Rn) and p-wave velocity (Vp) tests. To estimate the UCS of granitic rock as a function of relevant rock properties like Rn, p-wave and Is(50), the rock cores were collected from the face of the Pahang–Selangor fresh water tunnel in Malaysia. Afterwards, 124 samples are prepared and tested in accordance with relevant standards and the dataset is obtained. Further an established dataset is used for estimating the UCS of rock via three-nonlinear prediction tools, namely non-linear multiple regression (NLMR), artificial neural network (ANN) and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS). After conducting the mentioned models, considering several performance indices including coefficient of determination (R2), variance account for and root mean squared error and also using simple ranking procedure, the models were examined and the best prediction model was selected. It is concluded that the R2 equal to 0.951 for testing dataset suggests the superiority of the ANFIS model, while these values are 0.651 and 0.886 for NLMR and ANN techniques, respectively. The results pointed out that the ANFIS model can be used for predicting UCS of rocks with higher capacity in comparison with others. However, the developed model may be useful at a preliminary stage of design; it should be used with caution and only for the specified rock types. © 2015, Springer-Verlag London. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/11499/9638 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-015-0410-5 |
ISSN: | 0177-0667 |
Appears in Collections: | Mühendislik Fakültesi Koleksiyonu Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
Show full item record
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
119
checked on Nov 16, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
96
checked on Nov 21, 2024
Page view(s)
42
checked on Aug 24, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.