Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/9638
Title: Application of several non-linear prediction tools for estimating uniaxial compressive strength of granitic rocks and comparison of their performances
Authors: Jahed Armaghani, D.
Tonnizam Mohamad, E.
Hajihassani, M.
Yağız, Saffet
Motaghedi, H.
Keywords: Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system
Artificial neural network
Granite
Non-linear multiple regression
Uniaxial compressive strength
Compressive strength
Forecasting
Fuzzy inference
Fuzzy systems
Mean square error
Neural networks
Seismic waves
Statistical tests
Tracking (position)
Wave propagation
Coefficient of determination
Non linear
Non-linear predictions
Performance indices
Ranking procedures
Root mean squared errors
Rocks
Publisher: Springer-Verlag London Ltd
Abstract: Uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) of rock is crucial for any type of projects constructed in/on rock mass. The test that is conducted to measure the UCS of rock is expensive, time consuming and having sample restriction. For this reason, the UCS of rock may be estimated using simple rock tests such as point load index (Is(50)), Schmidt hammer (Rn) and p-wave velocity (Vp) tests. To estimate the UCS of granitic rock as a function of relevant rock properties like Rn, p-wave and Is(50), the rock cores were collected from the face of the Pahang–Selangor fresh water tunnel in Malaysia. Afterwards, 124 samples are prepared and tested in accordance with relevant standards and the dataset is obtained. Further an established dataset is used for estimating the UCS of rock via three-nonlinear prediction tools, namely non-linear multiple regression (NLMR), artificial neural network (ANN) and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS). After conducting the mentioned models, considering several performance indices including coefficient of determination (R2), variance account for and root mean squared error and also using simple ranking procedure, the models were examined and the best prediction model was selected. It is concluded that the R2 equal to 0.951 for testing dataset suggests the superiority of the ANFIS model, while these values are 0.651 and 0.886 for NLMR and ANN techniques, respectively. The results pointed out that the ANFIS model can be used for predicting UCS of rocks with higher capacity in comparison with others. However, the developed model may be useful at a preliminary stage of design; it should be used with caution and only for the specified rock types. © 2015, Springer-Verlag London.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/9638
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-015-0410-5
ISSN: 0177-0667
Appears in Collections:Mühendislik Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection

Show full item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

114
checked on Jun 29, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

90
checked on Jul 10, 2024

Page view(s)

34
checked on May 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.