Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11499/57901
Title: | Effect of adhesives and mechanical surface treatments on the hard relining of CAD-CAM denture bases | Authors: | Karaokutan, Isil Ayvaz, Ilayda Ozel, Gulsum Sayin |
Keywords: | adhesion computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing denture bases geriatric dentistry hard relining material 3D printing Bond Strength Soft Liners Resin Polymerization Zirconia Teeth Pmma |
Publisher: | Wiley | Abstract: | Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of mechanical roughening, adhesive applications, and aging on the bonding between CAD-CAM denture base materials with distinct chemical contents and hard relining material. Materials and Methods A total of 300 denture base specimens were produced by additive, subtractive, and conventional heat-polymerization techniques (N = 100). The specimens have been classified into five subgroups based on the particular surface treatments administered (n = 20): (1) Hard relining material's adhesive application (control); (2) Tungsten carbide bur application for 1 min, and hard reline material's adhesive application; (3) Airborne-particle abrasion (APA) with 110 mu m Al2O3, and hard reline material's adhesive application; (4) Scotchbond Universal application; and (5) Visio.link application. Representative specimens from each subgroup were examined under a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). Subsequently, self-cure hard relining material was condensed in the center of the specimens. Half of the specimens were thermally aged with 5000 cycles at 5 degrees C-55 degrees C. The shear bond strength (SBS) test was performed, and failure loads were recorded. The data was evaluated by Robust ANOVA and Bonferroni test (p < 0.05). Results No statistically significant difference was obtained between the production techniques (p = 0.051). The lowest SBS was observed in the control group among surface treatments, while mechanical surface treatments and universal adhesive showed the highest SBS for both aged and non-aged groups. Aging caused a significant decrease for all test groups (p = 0.001). Conclusions Mechanical surface treatments and universal adhesive applications are more effective for maintaining adhesion across all production techniques. | URI: | https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13934 https://hdl.handle.net/11499/57901 |
ISSN: | 1059-941X 1532-849X |
Appears in Collections: | Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Koleksiyonu PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
Effect of adhesives and mechanical.pdf | 1.12 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
CORE Recommender
Page view(s)
144
checked on Feb 8, 2025
Download(s)
60
checked on Feb 8, 2025
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.